Literature DB >> 15121255

Physical parameters influencing optimization of ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection.

Vladimir G Zarnitsyn1, Mark R Prausnitz.   

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) has been shown to transiently disrupt cell membranes and, thereby, facilitate the loading of drugs and genes into viable cells. To address optimization of gene therapy applications, the aim of this work was to systematically determine the influence of physical parameters on transfection and viability of DU145 prostate cancer cells by two different DNA plasmids (pEGFP-N1 and pGL3). By sonicating cells in vitro in the presence of naked DNA, we found that transfection efficiency was increased by: 1. optimizing acoustic energy at 10 to 30 J/cm(2) (for our apparatus, at pressures above the cavitation threshold); 2. using 500-kHz US in the presence of Optison to nucleate cavition, rather than 24-kHz US without Optison; 3. increasing cell concentration from 10(6) to 10(7) cells/mL; and 4. changing temperature during sonication from 21 to 37 degrees C. The best conditions in this study increased transfection by almost 100-fold in the absence of significant DNA damage. Additional measurements indicated that less than one fourth of cells with DNA plasmid uptake into the cytosol showed DNA expression, which suggests that further optimizing transfection by US may require facilitating intracellular DNA trafficking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15121255     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  32 in total

1.  Contrast agent-free sonoporation: The use of an ultrasonic standing wave microfluidic system for the delivery of pharmaceutical agents.

Authors:  Dario Carugo; Dyan N Ankrett; Peter Glynne-Jones; Lorenzo Capretto; Rosemary J Boltryk; Xunli Zhang; Paul A Townsend; Martyn Hill
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Different effects of sonoporation on cell morphology and viability.

Authors:  Ji-Zhen Zhang; Jasdeep K Saggar; Zhao-Li Zhou; Bing Hu
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.363

3.  Optimization and apoptosis induction by RNAi with UTMD technology in vitro.

Authors:  Zhi-Yi Chen; Kun Liang; Xiu-Jie Sheng; Bing Si-Tu; Xiao-Fang Sun; Jian-Qiao Liu; Ri-Xiang Qiu; Hua Zhang; Yue-Wei Li; Xin-Xin Zhou; Jiang-Xiu Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Synergistic effect of ultrasound and PEI on DNA transfection in vitro.

Authors:  Mangesh C Deshpande; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Ultrasound attenuation estimation using backscattered echoes from multiple sources.

Authors:  Timothy A Bigelow
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Modeling transmembrane transport through cell membrane wounds created by acoustic cavitation.

Authors:  Vladimir Zarnitsyn; Christina A Rostad; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Physical methods of nucleic acid transfer: general concepts and applications.

Authors:  Julien Villemejane; Lluis M Mir
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Key factors that affect sonoporation efficiency in in vitro settings: the importance of standing wave in sonoporation.

Authors:  Manabu Kinoshita; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Interaction mechanism between the focused ultrasound and lipid membrane at the molecular level.

Authors:  Viet Hoang Man; Mai Suan Li; Junmei Wang; Philippe Derreumaux; Phuong H Nguyen
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Sonoporation-mediated gene transfer into adult rat dorsal root ganglion cells.

Authors:  Chung-Ren Lin; Kuan-Hung Chen; Chien-Hui Yang; Jiin-Tsuey Cheng; Shyr-Ming Sheen-Chen; Chih-Hsien Wu; Wei-Dih Sy; Yi-Shen Chen
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 8.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.