Literature DB >> 15120961

Differentiation of DNA reactive and non-reactive genotoxic mechanisms using gene expression profile analysis.

Donna A Dickinson1, Gregory R Warnes, George Quievryn, Joseph Messer, Anatoly Zhitkovich, Elizabeth Rubitski, Jiri Aubrecht.   

Abstract

Genotoxic stress triggers a variety of biological responses including the transcriptional activation of genes regulating DNA repair, cell survival and cell death. Here, we investigated whether gene expression profiles can differentiate between DNA reactive and DNA non-reactive mechanisms of genotoxicity. We analyzed gene expression profiles and micronucleus levels in L5178Y cells treated with cisplatin and sodium chloride. The assessment of cisplatin genotoxicity (up to six-fold increase in the number of micronuclei) and gene expression profile (increased expression of genotoxic stress-associated genes) was in agreement with cisplatin mode of action as a DNA adduct-forming agent. The gene expression profile analysis of cisplatin-treated cells identified a number of genes with robust up regulation of mRNA expression including genes associated with DNA damage (i.e. members of GADD45 family), early response (i.e. cFOS), and heat shock protein (i.e. HSP40 homologue). The gene expression changes correlated well with DNA damage as measured by DNA-protein crosslinks and platinum-DNA binding. To differentiate the genotoxic stress-associated expression profile of cisplatin from a general toxic stress, we have compared the gene expression profile of cisplatin-treated cells to cells treated with sodium chloride, which causes osmotic shock and cell lysis. Although the sodium chloride treatment caused a two-fold induction of micronuclei, the gene expression profile at equitoxic concentrations was remarkably distinct from the profile observed with cisplatin. The profile of sodium chloride featured a complete lack of expression changes in genes associated with DNA damage and repair. In summary, the gene expression profiles clearly distinguished between DNA reactive and non-reactive genotoxic mechanisms of cisplatin and sodium chloride. Our results suggest the potential utility of gene expression profile analysis for elucidating mechanism of action of genotoxic agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15120961     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  7 in total

1.  Characterization and interlaboratory comparison of a gene expression signature for differentiating genotoxic mechanisms.

Authors:  Heidrun Ellinger-Ziegelbauer; Jennifer M Fostel; Chinami Aruga; Daniel Bauer; Eric Boitier; Shibing Deng; Donna Dickinson; Anne-Celine Le Fevre; Albert J Fornace; Olivier Grenet; Yizhong Gu; Jean-Christophe Hoflack; Masako Shiiyama; Roger Smith; Ronald D Snyder; Catherine Spire; Gotaro Tanaka; Jiri Aubrecht
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Chromium(VI) causes interstrand DNA cross-linking in vitro but shows no hypersensitivity in cross-link repair-deficient human cells.

Authors:  Jessica L Morse; Michal W Luczak; Anatoly Zhitkovich
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Role of direct reactivity with metals in chemoprotection by N-acetylcysteine against chromium(VI), cadmium(II), and cobalt(II).

Authors:  Michal W Luczak; Anatoly Zhitkovich
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 7.376

4.  Effect of chemical mutagens and carcinogens on gene expression profiles in human TK6 cells.

Authors:  Lode Godderis; Reuben Thomas; Alan E Hubbard; Ali M Tabish; Peter Hoet; Luoping Zhang; Martyn T Smith; Hendrik Veulemans; Cliona M McHale
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Integration of metabolic activation with a predictive toxicogenomics signature to classify genotoxic versus nongenotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells.

Authors:  Julie K Buick; Ivy Moffat; Andrew Williams; Carol D Swartz; Leslie Recio; Daniel R Hyduke; Heng-Hong Li; Albert J Fornace; Jiri Aubrecht; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  Application of the TGx-28.65 transcriptomic biomarker to classify genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells in the presence of rat liver S9.

Authors:  Carole L Yauk; Julie K Buick; Andrew Williams; Carol D Swartz; Leslie Recio; Heng-Hong Li; Albert J Fornace; Errol M Thomson; Jiri Aubrecht
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  A Qualitative Modeling Approach for Whole Genome Prediction Using High-Throughput Toxicogenomics Data and Pathway-Based Validation.

Authors:  Saad Haider; Michael B Black; Bethany B Parks; Briana Foley; Barbara A Wetmore; Melvin E Andersen; Rebecca A Clewell; Kamel Mansouri; Patrick D McMullen
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.810

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.