Literature DB >> 15120376

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy combined with preservation of the spleen for cystic neoplasms of the pancreas.

Laureano Fernández-Cruz1, Isidro Martínez, Rosa Gilabert, Gleydson Cesar-Borges, Emiliano Astudillo, Salvador Navarro.   

Abstract

The precise role of laparoscopy in the resection of cystic neoplasms of the pancreas (CyNP) remains unknown. In addition, the question of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy is controversial. This report evaluates the feasibility and outcome of laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LapSPDP) in 19 patients (17 women and 2 men) with CyNP. A prospective comparison was made between 11 consecutive patients (group I) with splenic vessel preservation (SVP) and 8 patients (group II) without SVP (Warshaw technique). This study used color-Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) as a tool to identify patients at high risk for postoperative splenic complications. The mean tumor size was, in both groups, 5 cm. In group I, with an intent-to-treat basis of SVP, only in 54.5% of patients the spleen was preserved with an intact splenic artery and vein; in the remainder, conversion to the Warshaw technique was required for intraoperative bleeding. Evaluation of intraoperative factors showed that the mean operative time was significantly shorter (165 vs. 222 minutes) and the mean blood loss significantly lower (225 vs. 495 mL) in the group of LapSPDP with the Warshaw technique. No patients required blood transfusion in both groups. The overall conversion rate was 0%. The overall rate of pancreatic fistula was 15% and it was classified as biochemical leak (no clinical symptomatology). Overall splenic complications were observed in 16.6% of patients but occurred only in three patients undergoing LapSPDP with the Warshaw technique; CDUS showed in 2 patients a focal splenic infarct; the third patient had an initial hospital stay of 5 days, was readmitted 2 days later for a massive splenic necrosis, and splenectomy was performed. The overall hospital stay was 5.7 days. At mean follow up of 22 months (range 6-42), there have been no local recurrences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15120376     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.11.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  33 in total

1.  Use of Doppler sonography for revealing hepatic artery stenosis in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  J F Platt; G G Yutzy; R O Bude; J H Ellis; J M Rubin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1994-06

3.  Is laparoscopic left pancreatic resection justified?

Authors:  J M Fabre; J L Dulucq; C Vacher; M C Lemoine; P Wintringer; D Nocca; J S Burgel; J Domergue
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.

Authors:  J H Balcom; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw; Y Chang; C Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

5.  Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  A L Warshaw
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1988-05

6.  Mucinous cystic tumors of the pancreas: clinicopathological features, prognosis, and relationship to other mucinous cystic tumors.

Authors:  G Zamboni; A Scarpa; G Bogina; C Iacono; C Bassi; G Talamini; F Sessa; C Capella; E Solcia; F Rickaert; G M Mariuzzi; G Klöppel
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Postsplenectomy sepsis and its mortality rate: actual versus perceived risks.

Authors:  R J Holdsworth; A D Irving; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Distal pancreatectomy with and without splenectomy.

Authors:  M C Aldridge; R C Williamson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Cystadenomas of the pancreas: is enucleation an adequate operation?

Authors:  M A Talamini; R Moesinger; C J Yeo; B Poulose; R H Hruban; J L Cameron; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  65 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy in pancreatic tumours: a case-control study.

Authors:  Riccardo Casadei; Claudio Ricci; Marielda D'Ambra; Nicola Marrano; Vincento Alagna; Daniela Rega; Francesco Monari; Francesco Minni
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2010-12

2.  Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  B W Eom; J-Y Jang; S E Lee; H-S Han; Y-S Yoon; S-W Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Distal pancreatic resection: technical differences between open and laparoscopic approaches.

Authors:  Laureano Fernández-Cruz
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Distal pancreatectomy: en-bloc splenectomy vs spleen-preserving pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Laureano Fernández-Cruz; David Orduña; Gleydson Cesar-Borges; Miguel Angel López-Boado
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with excision of splenic artery and vein: a cautionary note.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Balzano; Alessandro Zerbi; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: the Brisbane experience of forty-six cases.

Authors:  C Taylor; N O'Rourke; L Nathanson; I Martin; G Hopkins; L Layani; M Ghusn; G Fielding
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Changes in gastrosplenic circulation and splenic function after distal pancreatectomy with spleen preservation and splenic vessel excision.

Authors:  Gustavo Kohan; Carlos G Ocampo; Hugo I Zandalazini; Roberto Klappenbach; Bernabe M Quesada; Luis T Chiappetta Porras; Juan Alvarez Rodriguez; Alejandro S Oria
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with and without splenic vessel ligation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gaurav Jain; Saurav Chakravartty; Ameet G Patel
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: the technique must suit the lesion.

Authors:  David J Worhunsky; Yulia Zak; Monica M Dua; George A Poultsides; Jeffrey A Norton; Brendan C Visser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Laparoscopic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Abbas Al-Kurd; Katya Chapchay; Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg; Haggi Mazeh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.