Literature DB >> 15120369

Mechanical consequences of short gastric vessel division at the time of laparoscopic total fundoplication.

Cecilia Engström1, Anne Blomqvist, Jan Dalenbäck, Hans Lönroth, Magnus Ruth, Lars Lundell.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is currently the most commonly practiced antireflux operation. Some adverse consequences of the operation remain in the form of mechanical side effects, labeled postfundoplication complaints, of which dysphagia and gas bloat seem to predominate. Measures have been suggested to counteract some of these and one frequently advocated has been division of the short gastric vessels to create a short-floppy wrap. The advantages of this are still debated, particularly in the long-term perspective. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the mechanical consequences of dividing all short gastric vessels at the time of a laparoscopic total fundoplication. Ninety-nine patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were originally allocated on a random basis to have either all short gastric vessels divided or left intact at the time of a laparoscopic total fundoplication. A subsample of these patients, again selected at random, were recruited for a comprehensive manometric investigation 1 year after the operation. In this cohort, 12 patients had all short gastrics divided and in 12 patients, the wrap was done with intact vessels by use of the anterior portion of the fundus. Manometry was carried out by the use of a sleeve sensor to straddle the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and gastric distension (750 ml air) was used to trigger transient LES relaxations (TLESR). The basal LES tone was similar in the two groups (14.2 +/- 2.4 and 18.8 +/- 4.3, mean +/- SE), respectively. Accordingly, all other relevant manometric variables were equal when the two groups were compared, except for the total number of TLESRs (triggered by gastric distension by air) that were significantly higher (p < 0.02) in patients having their short gastric vessels intact. Consequently, numerically more common cavities were recorded in the latter group. Very similar outcomes in terms of motor function of the LES and esophageal body were observed after a total fundoplication irrespective of whether a complete division of all gastric vessels had been carried out or not. However, after gastric distension with air, more TLESRs were recorded in the latter group suggesting a better maintained ability to vent air from the stomach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15120369     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  34 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication: blind evaluation of recovery and discharge period.

Authors:  G Nilsson; S Larsson; F Johnsson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Does oesophageal motor function improve with time after successful antireflux surgery? Results of a prospective, randomised clinical study.

Authors:  L Rydberg; M Ruth; L Lundell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  [A simple operation for control of reflux esophagitis].

Authors:  R NISSEN
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  1956-05-18

4.  Control of belching by the lower oesophageal sphincter.

Authors:  J B Wyman; J Dent; R Heddle; W J Dodds; J Toouli; J Downton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Effect of fundoplication on transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation and gas reflux.

Authors:  F Johnsson; R H Holloway; A C Ireland; G G Jamieson; J Dent
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Post-fundoplication symptoms. Do they restrict the success of Nissen fundoplication?

Authors:  J B Negre
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Dysphagia after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. The impact of operative technique.

Authors:  J G Hunter; L Swanstrom; J P Waring
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Fate of Nissen fundoplication after 20 years. A clinical, endoscopical, and functional analysis.

Authors:  M Luostarinen; J Isolauri; J Laitinen; M Koskinen; O Keyriläinen; H Markkula; E Lehtinen; A Uusitalo
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Abolition of gas reflux and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation by vagal blockade in the dog.

Authors:  C J Martin; J Patrikios; J Dent
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Gastric distention: a mechanism for postprandial gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  R H Holloway; M Hongo; K Berger; R W McCallum
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; William W Hope; Geoffrey P Kohn; Patrick R Reardon; William S Richardson; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Sleeve gastrectomy with anti-reflux procedures.

Authors:  Sergio Santoro; Arnaldo Lacombe; Caio Gustavo Gaspar de Aquino; Carlos Eduardo Malzoni
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-09

3.  Management of complications after laparoscopic Nissen's fundoplication: a surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  Tarun Singhal; Santosh Balakrishnan; Abdulzahra Hussain; Starlene Grandy-Smith; Andrew Paix; Shamsi El-Hasani
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2009-02-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.