Literature DB >> 15120010

In-vitro intra- and inter-inhaler flow rate-dependent dosage emission from a combination of budesonide and eformoterol in a dry powder inhaler.

W Tarsin1, K H Assi, H Chrystyn.   

Abstract

Some dry powder inhalers have profound inhalation flow rate-dependent dosage emission, and it has been suggested that there are links between the in vitro emitted dose, total lung deposition, and subsequent clinical response. We have measured the in vitro dosage delivery for a combination of budesonide and eformoterol in a new version of the Turbuhaler. At inhalation flow rates of 30, 60, and 90 Lmin(-1), the total dose emission for 10 separate inhalations from each of six inhalers was determined. The aerodynamic characteristics of the emitted dose using inhalation flow rates of 28.3 and 60 Lmin(-1) were measured using the Andersen Cascade Impactor. The mean (SD) emitted dose for budesonide, at 30, 60, and 90 Lmin(-1), was 37.5%(18.2%), 64.4%(16.6%), and 107.4%(36.0%) (of the nominal emitted dose), respectively, and for eformoterol were 38.0%(20.3%), 65.0%(16.8%), and 104.9%(36.2%) (of the nominal emitted dose), respectively. Variability of dose emission characteristics from each inhaler and between inhalers at each flow rate was found. The aerodynamic particle size characterization of the emitted dose at flow rates of 28.3 and 60 Lmin(-1) revealed a mean fine particle dose for budesonide of 11.9% and 28.6% of the nominal emitted dose, respectively, and similarly 10.0% and 26.3% for eformoterol. At 28.3 Lmin(-1), the majority of the emitted dose (54.8% for budesonide and 64.5% for eformoterol) was deposited in the throat and preseparator of the Andersen Cascade Impactor. The mass median aerodynamic diameters for budesonide and eformoterol at 28.3 Lmin(-1) were 3.2 and 3.6 microm, respectively, and similarly at 60 Lmin(-1) were 2.4 and 2.5 microm. The modified Turbuhaler containing a budesonide and eformoterol combined formulation shows intra- and inter-inhaler flow-dependent dosage emission. The clinical significance of the in vitro dose-dependent properties should be investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15120010     DOI: 10.1089/089426804322994433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aerosol Med        ISSN: 0894-2684


  5 in total

Review 1.  Closer to an 'ideal inhaler' with the Easyhaler: an innovative dry powder inhaler.

Authors:  Henry Chrystyn
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Turning a molecule into a medicine: the development of indacaterol as a novel once-daily bronchodilator treatment for patients with COPD.

Authors:  Lorraine Murphy; Stephen Rennard; James Donohue; Mathieu Molimard; Ronald Dahl; Kai-Michael Beeh; Juergen Dederichs; Hans-Jürgen Fülle; Mark Higgins; David Young
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Performance Characteristics of Breezhaler® and Aerolizer® in the Real-World Setting.

Authors:  Mathieu Molimard; Ioannis Kottakis; Juergen Jauernig; Sonja Lederhilger; Ivan Nikolaev
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Comparison of the Efficacy of Budesonide Nebulizer Suspension and Budesonide Inhalation Suspension in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Mohammad Emami Ardestani; Elham Klantar; Mahdi Azimian
Journal:  Tanaffos       Date:  2018-02

Review 5.  The Diskus: a review of its position among dry powder inhaler devices.

Authors:  H Chrystyn
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.503

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.