Literature DB >> 15119464

Hearing specific and generic measures of the psychosocial impact of hearing aids.

Gabrielle H Saunders1, Jeffrey W Jutai.   

Abstract

Hearing-specific and generic measures of hearing aid outcome were examined in order (a) to determine their relative sensitivity to hearing aid use and (b) to examine the relationship between pre-hearing aid use expectations and post-use outcomes. Ninety-two hearing-impaired individuals completed some combination of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, Expected Consequences of Hearing Aid Ownership (ECHO), Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL), and Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale, and provided reports of their daily and lifetime hearing aid use. In general, (a) the longer individuals wear hearing aids, the more positive the reported outcome, and (b) ECHO scores of non-hearing aid users are higher than SADL scores of new hearing aid users (six weeks to one year of use) but are similar to those obtained from experienced users (greater than one year of use). Between-questionnaire comparisons showed the generic measure to be as sensitive as the hearing aid specific measures. We suggest that generic measures have some advantages over hearing specific measures but that each has a place in the clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15119464     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15.3.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  9 in total

1.  Hearing Impairment in Relation to Severity of Diabetes in a Veteran Cohort.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Kelly M Reavis; Donald Austin; Nicholas Reed; Jane Gordon; Dan McDermott; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Is measured hearing aid benefit affected by seeing baseline outcome questionnaire responses?

Authors:  ShienPei Silverman; Megan Cates; Gabrielle Saunders
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 3.  Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Line Vestergaard Knudsen; Marie Oberg; Claus Nielsen; Graham Naylor; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-09

4.  Effects of demographic, audiologic, and hearing-aid-related variables on the outcomes of using hearing aids.

Authors:  Xunyi Wang; Yun Zheng; Yiran Liu; Jingzhe Lu; Zhiyuan Cui; Zhen Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Adoption by Adults With High-Frequency Hearing Loss: The Beaver Dam Offspring Study.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Weycker; Lauren K Dillard; Alex Pinto; Mary E Fischer; Karen J Cruickshanks; Ted S Tweed
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 1.636

6.  Satisfaction and compliance of adult patients using hearing aid and evaluation of factors affecting them.

Authors:  Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz; Ömer Bayır; Serap Er; Eray Işık; Güleser Saylam; Emel Çadallı Tatar; Ali Özdek
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Predicting hearing aid use in adults: the Beaver Dam Offspring Study.

Authors:  Lauren K Dillard; Amy L Cochran; Alex Pinto; Cynthia G Fowler; Mary E Fischer; Ted S Tweed; Karen J Cruickshanks
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.437

8.  A Novel Communication Value Task Demonstrates Evidence of Response Bias in Cases with Presbyacusis.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Kenneth I Vaden; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Brandon S Bentzley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Cultural adaptation of the SADL (satisfaction with amplification in daily life) questionaire for Brazilian Portuguese.

Authors:  Maria Fernanda Capoani Garcia Mondelli; Fabiani Figueiredo Magalhães; José Roberto Pereira Lauris
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.