Literature DB >> 15118114

Evidence for spleen-specific uptake of a microbubble contrast agent: a quantitative study in healthy volunteers.

Adrian K P Lim1, Nayna Patel, Robert J Eckersley, Simon D Taylor-Robinson, David O Cosgrove, Martin J K Blomley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of the microbubble contrast agent BR1.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers were injected via arm vein with a 1.2-mL bolus of BR1. Ultrasonographic images of liver and right kidney and of spleen and left kidney were obtained intermittently for 5 minutes with low-mechanical-index software (to minimize microbubble destruction) that shows stationary microbubbles in green. Percentage total uptake was calculated as the number of green pixels in the region of interest for each organ over time, divided by the total pixels. Relative uptake, the ratio of total uptake in liver to that in right kidney and of total uptake in spleen to that in left kidney, and differential uptake, the difference in total uptake between liver and right kidney and between spleen and left kidney, were calculated. Total uptake for each organ was plotted against time, and the gradient of a best-fit straight line was calculated. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare mean uptake values in each subject. Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparisons in sex and age.
RESULTS: Total uptake declined over 5 minutes in left and right kidney and in liver (from 88% +/- 10% [1 minute] to 67% +/- 14% [5 minutes]), but not in spleen (range, 90%-99%). Mean relative uptake +/- 1 SD for spleen increased from 2.3 +/- 0.7 (1 minute) to 3.7 +/- 2.3 (5 minutes) (P =.005) but for liver was constant: 2.1 +/- 0.9 (1 minute) and 2.3 +/- 0.4 (5 minutes) (P =.06). Mean differential uptake +/- 1 SD for spleen increased from 51.3% +/- 14.9% (1 minute) to 65.0% +/- 9.1% (5 minutes) (P =.002). Significant difference was seen over time in total uptake gradients between spleen and left kidney (P =.014) but not between liver and right kidney or right and left kidney. No difference was seen between men and women or with age.
CONCLUSION: BR1 produces spleen-specific enhancement that is longer (5 minutes) than the blood pool phase. Copyright RSNA, 2004

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15118114     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2313030544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  31 in total

Review 1.  A review of low-intensity ultrasound for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Andrew K W Wood; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  [Ultrasound contrast agents: substance classes, pharmacokinetics, clinical applications, safety aspects].

Authors:  C Krestan
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Recent applications of ultrasound: diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hitoshi Maruyama; Masaaki Ebara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: an update.

Authors:  Emilio Quaia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Focal splenic lesions: US findings.

Authors:  M Caremani; U Occhini; A Caremani; D Tacconi; L Lapini; A Accorsi; C Mazzarelli
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2013-05-04

6.  Liquid Flooded Flow-Focusing Microfluidic Device for in situ Generation of Monodisperse Microbubbles.

Authors:  Ali Haider Dhanaliwala; Johnny L Chen; Shiying Wang; John A Hossack
Journal:  Microfluid Nanofluidics       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 2.529

7.  Ultrasonography of sclerosing angiomatoid nodular transformation in the spleen.

Authors:  Jia-Ying Cao; Hui Zhang; Wen-Ping Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Ultrasonography of splenic abnormalities.

Authors:  Ming-Jen Chen; Ming-Jer Huang; Wen-Hsiung Chang; Tsang-En Wang; Horng-Yuan Wang; Cheng-Hsin Chu; Shee-Chan Lin; Shou-Chuan Shih
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Differential diagnosis between splenic nodules and peritoneal metastases with contrast-enhanced ultrasound based on signal-intensity characteristics during the late phase.

Authors:  M Bertolotto; E Quaia; R Zappetti; G Cester; A Turoldo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Pitfalls of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of splenic sarcoidosis.

Authors:  C Tana; G Iannetti; P D'Alessandro; M Tana; A Mezzetti; C Schiavone
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2013-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.