Literature DB >> 15117719

Influence of structural geometry on the severity of bicuspid aortic stenosis.

Kathryn E Richards1, Dimitri Deserranno, Erwan Donal, Neil L Greenberg, James D Thomas, Mario J Garcia.   

Abstract

Doppler-derived gradients may overestimate total pressure loss in degenerative and prosthetic aortic valve stenosis (AS) due to unaccounted pressure recovery distal to the orifice. However, in congenitally bicuspid valves, jet eccentricity may result in a higher anatomic-to-effective orifice contraction ratio, resulting in an increased pressure loss at the valve and a reduced pressure recovery distal to the orifice leading to greater functional severity. The objective of our study was to determine the impact of local geometry on the total versus Doppler-derived pressure loss and therefore the assessed severity of the stenosis in bicuspid valves. On the basis of clinically obtained measurements, two- and three-dimensional computer simulations were created with various local geometries by altering the diameters of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT; 1.8-3.0 cm), orifice diameter (OD; 0.8-1.6 cm), and aortic root diameter (AR; 3.0-5.4 cm). Jet eccentricity was altered in the models from 0 to 25 degrees. Simulations were performed under steady-flow conditions. Axisymmetric simulations indicate that the overall differences in pressure recovery were minor for variations in LVOT diameter (<3%). However, both OD and AR had a significant impact on pressure recovery (6-20%), with greatest recovery being the larger OD and the smaller recovery being the AR. In addition, three-dimensional data illustrate a greater pressure loss for eccentric jets with the same orifice area, thus increasing functional severity. In conclusion, jet eccentricity results in greater pressure loss in bicuspid valve AS due to reduced effective orifice area. Functional severity may also be enhanced by larger aortic roots, commonly occurring in these patients, leading to reduced pressure recovery. Thus, for the same anatomic orifice area, functional severity is greater in bicuspid than in degenerative tricuspid AS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15117719     DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00264.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  7 in total

1.  Evidence of subannular and left ventricular morphological differences in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis: magnetic resonance imaging-based analysis.

Authors:  Kushtrim Disha; Georg Dubslaff; Mina Rouman; Beatrix Fey; Michael A Borger; Alex J Barker; Thomas Kuntze; Evaldas Girdauskas
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-03-01

2.  Fully coupled fluid-structure interaction model of congenital bicuspid aortic valves: effect of asymmetry on hemodynamics.

Authors:  Gil Marom; Hee-Sun Kim; Moshe Rosenfeld; Ehud Raanani; Rami Haj-Ali
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Numerical model of full-cardiac cycle hemodynamics in a total artificial heart and the effect of its size on platelet activation.

Authors:  Gil Marom; Wei-Che Chiu; Jessica R Crosby; Katrina J DeCook; Saurabh Prabhakar; Marc Horner; Marvin J Slepian; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Petter Dyverfeldt; Michael D Hope; Elaine E Tseng; David Saloner
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-01

Review 5.  Surgical treatment of bicuspid aortic valve disease: knowledge gaps and research perspectives.

Authors:  Alessandro Della Corte; Simon C Body; Anna M Booher; Hans-Joachim Schaefers; Rita K Milewski; Hector I Michelena; Arturo Evangelista; Philippe Pibarot; Patrick Mathieu; Giuseppe Limongelli; Prem S Shekar; Sary F Aranki; Andrea Ballotta; Giuseppe Di Benedetto; Natzi Sakalihasan; Gianantonio Nappi; Kim A Eagle; Joseph E Bavaria; Alessandro Frigiola; Thoralf M Sundt
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 6.  Post-stenotic aortic dilatation.

Authors:  Emma Wilton; Marjan Jahangiri
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  Estimating the irreversible pressure drop across a stenosis by quantifying turbulence production using 4D Flow MRI.

Authors:  Hojin Ha; Jonas Lantz; Magnus Ziegler; Belen Casas; Matts Karlsson; Petter Dyverfeldt; Tino Ebbers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.