Literature DB >> 15117230

Osteoblasts subjected to spaceflight and simulated space shuttle launch conditions.

Melissa A Kacena1, Paul Todd, William J Landis.   

Abstract

To understand further the effects of spaceflight on osteoblast-enriched cultures, normal chicken calvarial osteoblasts were flown aboard shuttle flight STS-77, and the total number of attached cells was determined. Spaceflight and control cultures were chemically fixed 3 h and 3 d after launch. These fixed cultures were processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SEM analysis showed that with just 3 d of exposure to spaceflight, coverslip cultures contained 300 +/- 100 cells/mm2, whereas 1G control samples contained a confluent monolayer of cells (2400 +/- 200 cells/mm2). Although the cultures flown in space experienced a drastic decline in cell number in just 3 d, without further experimentation it was impossible to determine whether the decline was a result of microgravity, the harsh launch environment, or some combination of these factors. Therefore, this research attempted to address the effect of launch by subjecting osteoblasts to conditions simulating shuttle launch accelerations, noise, and vibrations. No differences, compared with controls, were seen in the number of total or viable cells after exposure to these various launch conditions. Taken together, these data indicate that the magnitude of gravitational loading (3G maximum) and vibration (7.83G rms maximum) resulting from launch does not adversely affect osteoblasts in terms of total or viable cell number immediately, but launch conditions, or the microgravity environment itself, may start a cascade of events that over several d contributes to cell loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15117230     DOI: 10.1290/1543-706X(2003)039<0454:OSTSAS>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim        ISSN: 1071-2690            Impact factor:   2.416


  31 in total

Review 1.  Invited review: what do we know about the effects of spaceflight on bone?

Authors:  R T Turner
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2000-08

Review 2.  The effect of microgravity on morphology and gene expression of osteoblasts in vitro.

Authors:  G Carmeliet; R Bouillon
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  The effect of microgravity on bone fracture healing in rats flown on Cosmos-2044.

Authors:  A S Kaplansky; G N Durnova; T E Burkovskaya; E V Vorotnikova
Journal:  Physiologist       Date:  1991-02

Review 4.  Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  C H Turner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Demonstration of feasibility of automated osteoblastic line culture in space flight.

Authors:  A Guignandon; C Genty; L Vico; M H Lafage-Proust; S Palle; C Alexandre
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Nuclear morphometric analysis of osteoblast precursor cells in periodontal ligament, SL-3 rats.

Authors:  W E Roberts; P J Fielder; L M Rosenoer; A C Maese; M R Gonsalves; E R Morey
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1987-02

7.  Microgravity reduces the differentiation of human osteoblastic MG-63 cells.

Authors:  G Carmeliet; G Nys; R Bouillon
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Spaceflight alters bone mechanics and modeling drifts in growing rats.

Authors:  E G Vajda; T J Wronski; B P Halloran; K N Bachus; S C Miller
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2001-08

Review 9.  Effects of microgravity on bone and calcium homeostasis.

Authors:  E Zerath
Journal:  Adv Space Res       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.152

10.  Effects of spaceflight and simulated weightlessness on longitudinal bone growth.

Authors:  J D Sibonga; M Zhang; G L Evans; K C Westerlind; J M Cavolina; E Morey-Holton; R T Turner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  7 in total

1.  The effects of space flight and microgravity on the growth and differentiation of PICM-19 pig liver stem cells.

Authors:  Neil C Talbot; Thomas J Caperna; LeAnn Blomberg; Paul G Graninger; Louis S Stodieck
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 2.  Cell culture systems for studies of bone and tooth mineralization.

Authors:  Adele L Boskey; Rani Roy
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Possible role of non-muscle alpha-actinins in muscle cell mechanosensitivity.

Authors:  Irina V Ogneva; Nikolay S Biryukov; Toomas A Leinsoo; Irina M Larina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Drosophila melanogaster Sperm under Simulated Microgravity and a Hypomagnetic Field: Motility and Cell Respiration.

Authors:  Irina V Ogneva; Maria A Usik; Maria V Burtseva; Nikolay S Biryukov; Yuliya S Zhdankina; Vladimir N Sychev; Oleg I Orlov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Cell mechanosensitivity: mechanical properties and interaction with gravitational field.

Authors:  I V Ogneva
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Genome‑wide analysis and prediction of functional long noncoding RNAs in osteoblast differentiation under simulated microgravity.

Authors:  Zebing Hu; Han Wang; Yixuan Wang; Hua Zhou; Fei Shi; Jiangdong Zhao; Shu Zhang; Xinsheng Cao
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.952

7.  Mitochondrial Respiration in Drosophila Ovaries after a Full Cycle of Oogenesis under Simulated Microgravity.

Authors:  Irina V Ogneva; Maria A Usik
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.976

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.