Literature DB >> 15117001

The role of spurious feature familiarity in recognition memory.

Rachel A Diana1, Margaret J Peterson, Lynne M Reder.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated the role of perceptual information in spurious recognition judgments. Participants viewed lists of words in various unusual fonts. The frequency with which each font was presented was manipulated at study: Each font was presented with 1 or 12 different words in Experiment 1 and with 1 or 20 words in Experiment 2. Although the participants were instructed in a word recognition test to judge only on the basis of the word, regardless of font, there were significantly more false alarms for new words seen in a previously presented font than for new words presented in a novel (not seen at study) font in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, the participants were significantly more likely to make a false alarm to a new word seen in a font that had been used to present 20 words during study than to a font that had been used to present only 1 word during study. The data show a mirror effect, in which words tested in low-frequency fonts produced more hits and fewer false alarms than did words tested in high-frequency fonts. These results show that irrelevant perceptual information plays a role in recognition judgments by providing spurious sources of familiarity and, thus, provide evidence that perceptual information is represented and processed in the same way as semantic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15117001      PMCID: PMC1361528          DOI: 10.3758/bf03206475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: a computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.

Authors:  L M Reder; A Nhouyvanisvong; C D Schunn; M S Ayers; P Angstadt; K Hiraki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: when old does not mirror new.

Authors:  S Joordens; W E Hockley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.

Authors:  J DEESE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-07

Review 4.  Implicit memory. Retention without remembering.

Authors:  H L Roediger
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1990-09

5.  Contributions of surface and conceptual information to recognition memory.

Authors:  S M Sheffert
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-10

6.  Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in word-fragment completion.

Authors:  H L Roediger; T A Blaxton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-09

7.  Direct comparison of four implicit memory tests.

Authors:  S Rajaram; H L Roediger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 8.  The regularities of recognition memory.

Authors:  M Glanzer; J K Adams; G J Iverson; K Kim
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Contributions of surface and conceptual information to performance on implicit and explicit memory tasks.

Authors:  F I Craik; M Moscovitch; J M McDowd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Are emotionally charged lures immune to false memory?

Authors:  B J Pesta; M D Murphy; R E Sanders
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  8 in total

1.  Perceptual match effects in direct tests of memory: the role of contextual fan.

Authors:  Lynne M Reder; Dimitrios K Donavos; Michael A Erickson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-03

2.  Increasing the salience of fluency cues reduces the recognition memory impairment in amnesia.

Authors:  Margaret M Keane; Frances Orlando; Mieke Verfaellie
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Models of recognition: a review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Lynne M Reder; Jason Arndt; Heekyeong Park
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

4.  A contextual interference account of distinctiveness effects in recognition.

Authors:  Heekyeong Park; Jason Arndt; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

5.  Orthographic neighborhood size effects in recognition memory.

Authors:  Gina A Glanc; Robert L Greene
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

Review 6.  Memory systems do not divide on consciousness: Reinterpreting memory in terms of activation and binding.

Authors:  Lynne M Reder; Heekyeong Park; Paul D Kieffaber
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Why it's easier to remember seeing a face we already know than one we don't: preexisting memory representations facilitate memory formation.

Authors:  Lynne M Reder; Lindsay W Victoria; Anna Manelis; Joyce M Oates; Janine M Dutcher; Jordan T Bates; Shaun Cook; Howard J Aizenstein; Joseph Quinlan; Ferenc Gyulai
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-02-08

8.  Parahippocampal cortex activation during context reinstatement predicts item recollection.

Authors:  Rachel A Diana; Andrew P Yonelinas; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-08-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.