Literature DB >> 15116820

Dome down laparosonic cholecystectomy.

J Rosenberg1, T Leinskold.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In cases of cholecystitis or other difficult situations conversion to laparotomy may be necessary. Furthermore, some cases of bile duct injury may be caused by anatomical variations and/or injuries caused by electrocautery. A new laparoscopic technique using a fundus-first technique with ultrasonic dissection ("dome down laparosonic cholecystectomy") may potentially solve these problems.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty non-selected and consecutive patients with gallstone disease had laparoscopic cholecystectomy by the laparosonic dome down technique. Effect parameters were operative findings, duration of surgery and clinical course.
RESULTS: Six patients had fibrotic chronic cholecystitis and one had acute cholecystitis. Three patients had intraoperative cholangiography because of elevated liver enzymes. All operations were completed by the intended laparosonic dome down technique. Median duration of surgery in the 20 patients was 35 minutes (range 20-60). Median duration of surgery in the first 5 patients was 55 minutes (35-60), and in the last 15 patients it was 30 minutes (20-50). All patients had uneventful clinical courses with a median hospital stay of 0 days (0-1).
CONCLUSIONS: The technique was easy to learn and this new operative technique seems promising especially in cases of inflammation or fibrosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15116820     DOI: 10.1177/145749690409300110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Surg        ISSN: 1457-4969            Impact factor:   2.360


  9 in total

1.  Improved outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection: a randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  Yucel Cengiz; Jan Dalenbäck; Gunnar Edlund; Leif A Israelsson; Arthur Jänes; Mats Möller; Anders Thorell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Is fundus first laparoscopic cholecystectomy a better option than conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for difficult cholecystectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ibrahım Umar Garzali; Anas Aburumman; Yousef Alsardia; Belal Alabdallat; Saad Wraikat; Ali Aloun
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-10-07

3.  Laparoscopic retrograde (fundus first) cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Michael D Kelly
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Twenty years after Erich Muhe: Persisting controversies with the gold standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kalpesh Jani; P S Rajan; K Sendhilkumar; C Palanivelu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Monopolar electrocautery versus ultrasonic dissection of the gallbladder from the gallbladder bed in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Varun Mahabaleshwar; Lileswar Kaman; Javid Iqbal; Rajinder Singh
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Nereo Vettoretto; Cristiano Saronni; Asaf Harbi; Luca Balestra; Lucio Taglietti; Maurizio Giovanetti
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Learning by doing: an observational study of the learning curve for ultrasonic fundus-first dissection in elective cholecystectomy.

Authors:  My Blohm; Gabriel Sandblom; Lars Enochsson; Yücel Cengiz; Edmunds Austrums; Elisabeth Abdon; Joakim Hennings; Mats Hedberg; Ulf Gustafsson; Angelica Diaz-Pannes; Johanna Österberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.453

8.  Antegrade dissection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Neri; Antonio Ambrosi; Alberto Fersini; Nicola Tartaglia; Tiziano Pio Valentino
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 9.  2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Nicola de'Angelis; Fausto Catena; Riccardo Memeo; Federico Coccolini; Aleix Martínez-Pérez; Oreste M Romeo; Belinda De Simone; Salomone Di Saverio; Raffaele Brustia; Rami Rhaiem; Tullio Piardi; Maria Conticchio; Francesco Marchegiani; Nassiba Beghdadi; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Ruslan Alikhanov; Marc-Antoine Allard; Niccolò Allievi; Giuliana Amaddeo; Luca Ansaloni; Roland Andersson; Enrico Andolfi; Mohammad Azfar; Miklosh Bala; Amine Benkabbou; Offir Ben-Ishay; Giorgio Bianchi; Walter L Biffl; Francesco Brunetti; Maria Clotilde Carra; Daniel Casanova; Valerio Celentano; Marco Ceresoli; Osvaldo Chiara; Stefania Cimbanassi; Roberto Bini; Raul Coimbra; Gian Luigi de'Angelis; Francesco Decembrino; Andrea De Palma; Philip R de Reuver; Carlos Domingo; Christian Cotsoglou; Alessandro Ferrero; Gustavo P Fraga; Federica Gaiani; Federico Gheza; Angela Gurrado; Ewen Harrison; Angel Henriquez; Stefan Hofmeyr; Roberta Iadarola; Jeffry L Kashuk; Reza Kianmanesh; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Yoram Kluger; Filippo Landi; Serena Langella; Real Lapointe; Bertrand Le Roy; Alain Luciani; Fernando Machado; Umberto Maggi; Ronald V Maier; Alain Chichom Mefire; Kazuhiro Hiramatsu; Carlos Ordoñez; Franca Patrizi; Manuel Planells; Andrew B Peitzman; Juan Pekolj; Fabiano Perdigao; Bruno M Pereira; Patrick Pessaux; Michele Pisano; Juan Carlos Puyana; Sandro Rizoli; Luca Portigliotti; Raffaele Romito; Boris Sakakushev; Behnam Sanei; Olivier Scatton; Mario Serradilla-Martin; Anne-Sophie Schneck; Mohammed Lamine Sissoko; Iradj Sobhani; Richard P Ten Broek; Mario Testini; Roberto Valinas; Giorgos Veloudis; Giulio Cesare Vitali; Dieter Weber; Luigi Zorcolo; Felice Giuliante; Paschalis Gavriilidis; David Fuks; Daniele Sommacale
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.469

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.