Literature DB >> 15115202

Defaecation and weight of the gastrointestinal tract contents after feed and water withdrawal in broilers.

P D Warriss1, L J Wilkins, S N Brown, A J Phillips, V Allen.   

Abstract

1. Broilers were held under constant light for up to 24 h with access to feed and water, access to water only, or access to neither feed nor water. 2. Birds given continuous access to feed ate evenly over the 24-h period. Feed deprivation reduced drinking behaviour to about half of that when feed was available. Deprivation of feed, or of feed and water, had similar effects on defaecation and the reduction in the weight of the gut contents. It reduced the overall number of defaecations over the 24-h period to about 40% of that in birds given food and water, and the weight of the contents by about 75%. The maximum effect of deprivation on defaecation was seen after about 4 h, and on gut contents weight after about 12 h. 3. With longer fasting the contents of most parts of the gut, except the caeca, became wetter. 4. The findings may have implications for the practice of preslaughter food withdrawal to reduce the potential for soiling of the live birds and contamination of the carcase after slaughter. However, the likelihood is that relatively short overall feed deprivation times of not more than 8 to 12 h before killing may be desirable, but specifying firm recommendations on optimal feed withdrawal times requires further work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15115202     DOI: 10.1080/0007166041668879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  6 in total

Review 1.  Quo vadis? - Monitoring Campylobacter in Germany.

Authors:  K Stingl; M-T Knüver; P Vogt; C Buhler; N-J Krüger; K Alt; B-A Tenhagen; M Hartung; A Schroeter; L Ellerbroek; B Appel; A Käsbohrer
Journal:  Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp)       Date:  2012-03-17

2.  Welfare of domestic birds and rabbits transported in containers.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Christian Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Hans Spoolder; Karl Stahl; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Malcolm Mitchell; Leonardo James Vinco; Eva Voslarova; Denise Candiani; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Antonio Velarde
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-09-07

3.  Comparative analysis of the characteristics of digestive organs in broiler chickens with different feed efficiencies.

Authors:  Qiang Huang; Chaoliang Wen; Wei Yan; Congjiao Sun; Shuang Gu; Jiangxia Zheng; Ning Yang
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 4.  Composition and Function of Chicken Gut Microbiota.

Authors:  Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Mapping foodborne pathogen contamination throughout the conventional and alternative poultry supply chains.

Authors:  Chase E Golden; Michael J Rothrock; Abhinav Mishra
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  In vitro Modeling of Chicken Cecal Microbiota Ecology and Metabolism Using the PolyFermS Platform.

Authors:  Paul Tetteh Asare; Anna Greppi; Alessia Pennacchia; Katharina Brenig; Annelies Geirnaert; Clarissa Schwab; Roger Stephan; Christophe Lacroix
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.