Literature DB >> 15114639

High frequency electromagnetic fields (GSM signals) affect gene expression levels in tumor suppressor p53-deficient embryonic stem cells.

Jaroslaw Czyz1, Kaomei Guan, Qinghua Zeng, Teodora Nikolova, Armin Meister, Frank Schönborn, Jürgen Schuderer, Niels Kuster, Anna M Wobus.   

Abstract

Effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) simulating exposure to the Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) signals were studied using pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cells in vitro. Wild-type ES cells and ES cells deficient for the tumor suppressor p53 were exposed to pulse modulated EMF at 1.71 GHz, lower end of the uplink band of GSM 1800, under standardized and controlled conditions, and transcripts of regulatory genes were analyzed during in vitro differentiation. Two dominant GSM modulation schemes (GSM-217 and GSM-Talk), which generate temporal changes between GSM-Basic (active during talking phases) and GSM-DTX (active during listening phases thus simulating a typical conversation), were applied to the cells at and below the basic safety limits for local exposures as defined for the general public by the International Commission on Nonionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). GSM-217 EMF induced a significant upregulation of mRNA levels of the heat shock protein, hsp70 of p53-deficient ES cells differentiating in vitro, paralleled by a low and transient increase of c-jun, c-myc, and p21 levels in p53-deficient, but not in wild-type cells. No responses were observed in either cell type after EMF exposure to GSM-Talk applied at similar slot-averaged specific absorption rates (SAR), but at lower time-averaged SAR values. Cardiac differentiation and cell cycle characteristics were not affected in embryonic stem and embryonic carcinoma cells after exposure to GSM-217 EMF signals. Our data indicate that the genetic background determines cellular responses to GSM modulated EMF. Bioelectromagnetics 25:296-307, 2004. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15114639     DOI: 10.1002/bem.10199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  10 in total

1.  Effect of 60 Hz magnetic fields on the activation of hsp70 promoter in cultured INER-37 and RMA E7 cells.

Authors:  J Antonio Heredia-Rojas; Abraham Octavio Rodríguez de la Fuente; Juan Manuel Alcocer González; Laura E Rodríguez-Flores; Cristina Rodríguez-Padilla; Martha A Santoyo-Stephano; Esperanza Castañeda-Garza; Reyes S Taméz-Guerra
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 2.416

2.  The Effect of Prenatal Exposure to 2.4 GHz Radio Frequency on the Histology and Expression of the osteocalcin and RUNX2 Gene of the Forelimb in an NMRI Mouse.

Authors:  Shaghayegh Amandokht Saghezchi; Nahid Azad; Reihane Heidari; Vahid Jajarmi; Shabnam Abdi; Hojjat-Allah Abaszadeh; Seyedeh Susan Sadjadpour; Naheid Neikoei; Mohammad Hassan Heidari; Mohammad-Amin Abdollahifar
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-01

Review 3.  Present state and future perspectives of using pluripotent stem cells in toxicology research.

Authors:  Anna M Wobus; Peter Löser
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (UMTS, 1,950 MHz) induce genotoxic effects in vitro in human fibroblasts but not in lymphocytes.

Authors:  Claudia Schwarz; Elisabeth Kratochvil; Alexander Pilger; Niels Kuster; Franz Adlkofer; Hugo W Rüdiger
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Evaluation of biological effects of intermediate frequency magnetic field on differentiation of embryonic stem cell.

Authors:  Sachiko Yoshie; Yuki Ogasawara; Masateru Ikehata; Kazuyuki Ishii; Yukihisa Suzuki; Keiji Wada; Kanako Wake; Satoshi Nakasono; Masao Taki; Chiyoji Ohkubo
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2016-01-04

6.  Thapsigargin blocks electromagnetic field-elicited intracellular Ca2+ increase in HEK 293 cells.

Authors:  Federico Bertagna; Rebecca Lewis; S Ravi P Silva; Johnjoe McFadden; Kamalan Jeevaratnam
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-05

Review 7.  Real versus Simulated Mobile Phone Exposures in Experimental Studies.

Authors:  Dimitris J Panagopoulos; Olle Johansson; George L Carlo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field on differentiation of HUES-17 human embryonic stem cell line.

Authors:  Yi-Lin Wu; Shi-Rong Ma; Tao Peng; Zeng-Hui Teng; Xiang-Yan Liang; Guo-Zhen Guo; Hai-Feng Zhang; Kang-Chu Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Quality Matters: Systematic Analysis of Endpoints Related to "Cellular Life" in Vitro Data of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure.

Authors:  Myrtill Simkó; Daniel Remondini; Olga Zeni; Maria Rosaria Scarfi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The Use of Signal-Transduction and Metabolic Pathways to Predict Human Disease Targets from Electric and Magnetic Fields Using in vitro Data in Human Cell Lines.

Authors:  Fred Parham; Christopher J Portier; Xiaoqing Chang; Meike Mevissen
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2016-09-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.