Literature DB >> 15114491

Renal dimensions measured by ultrasonography in children: variations as a function of the imaging plane and patient position.

Sven C Michel1, Ishilde Forster, Burkhardt Seifert, Ulrich V Willi, Thierry A G M Huisman.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of patient positioning on sonographic renal measurements and to test if the patient position alters the three-dimensional shape of the kidneys. The maximum longitudinal renal length and transverse renal width and depth were measured in the supine and prone position in 100 children (200 kidneys). Age ranged from 6 months to 16 years (mean age 5 years). The results were compared for statistically significant differences. The maximum measured longitudinal renal length was statistically significantly larger in the supine than in the prone position (supine position, left: 8.0 cm; right: 7.7 cm; prone position, left: 7.9 cm, right: 7.6 cm; P<0.001). There was no statistically significant change in the transverse diameters (width and depth, P>0.001) and renal volume ( P>0.001) in the supine vs. prone positions. Our results show that position-induced reshaping of the kidneys is unlikely to be responsible for the discrepancy in maximum longitudinal renal measurements comparing supine with prone positions. Position-dependent changes in the degree of filling of the renal calyces and pelvis as well as errors in caliper distance measurements for the different scan depths (supine vs. prone) are more likely to be responsible for the encountered differences. Consequently, we recommend to add prone renal length measurements in addition to the supine measurements. In follow-up examinations, renal length measurements should only be compared that have been collected in the same patient position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15114491     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2332-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  11 in total

1.  Renal volume measurements: accuracy and repeatability of US compared with that of MR imaging.

Authors:  J Bakker; M Olree; R Kaatee; E E de Lange; K G Moons; J J Beutler; F J Beek
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Observer variability in the sonographic measurement of renal length in childhood.

Authors:  M A Sargent; B P Wilson
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Three-dimensional ultrasound: accuracy of distance and volume measurements.

Authors:  M Riccabona; T R Nelson; D H Pretorius
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Renal length changes with position.

Authors:  M Nakamura; K Itoh
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1998-03

5.  Anatomic changes in the normal urinary tract betwen supine and prone urograms.

Authors:  W Riggs; J H Hagood; A E Andrews
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Kidney size in childhood. Sonographical growth charts for kidney length and volume.

Authors:  E Dinkel; M Ertel; M Dittrich; H Peters; M Berres; H Schulte-Wissermann
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1985

7.  Sonographic measurement of renal length in children: does the position of the patient matter?

Authors:  C W Carrico; J M Zerin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1996

8.  Normal liver, spleen, and kidney dimensions in neonates, infants, and children: evaluation with sonography.

Authors:  O L Konuş; A Ozdemir; A Akkaya; G Erbaş; H Celik; S Işik
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Advantages of prone positioning in gastrointestinal and genitourinary roentgenologic studies in infants and children.

Authors:  W E Berdon; D H Baker; J Leonidas
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1968-06

10.  Potential applications of three-dimensional ultrasound in the pediatric urinary tract: pictorial demonstration based on preliminary results.

Authors:  M Riccabona; G Fritz; E Ring
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  5 in total

1.  Kidney development in the first year of life in small-for-gestational-age preterm infants.

Authors:  Efthalia Hotoura; Maria Argyropoulou; Frederica Papadopoulou; Vasilios Giapros; Aikaterini Drougia; Panayiotis Nikolopoulos; Styliani Andronikou
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2005-06-23

2.  Are normative sonographic values of kidney size in children valid and reliable? A systematic review of the methodological quality of ultrasound studies using the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) tool.

Authors:  Viswas Chhapola; Soumya Tiwari; Bobbity Deepthi; Brandon Michael Henry; Rekha Brar; Sandeep Kumar Kanwal
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.902

3.  Assessment of serum cystatin C in children with congenital solitary kidney.

Authors:  Anna Wasilewska; Walentyna Zoch-Zwierz; Iwona Jadeszko; Tadeusz Porowski; Anna Biernacka; Alicja Niewiarowska; Agata Korzeniecka-Kozerska
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Sonographic measurements for kidney length in normal Saudi children: correlation with other body parameters.

Authors:  Rafat Saeed Mohtasib; Kamal Mostafa Alshamiri; Aman Asad Jobeir; Farida Mohsin Ambo Saidi; Ahmed Mohammed Masawi; Lamya Sami Alabdulaziz; Faisal Zaid Bin Hussain
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 1.526

5.  Kidney length normative values in children aged 0-19 years - a multicenter study.

Authors:  Łukasz Obrycki; Jędrzej Sarnecki; Marianna Lichosik; Małgorzata Sopińska; Małgorzata Placzyńska; Małgorzata Stańczyk; Julia Mirecka; Agnieszka Wasilewska; Maciej Michalski; Weronika Lewandowska; Tadeusz Dereziński; Michał Pac; Natalia Szwarc; Karol Annusewicz; Viktoriia Rekuta; Karolis Ažukaitis; Andrius Čekuolis; Aldona Wierzbicka-Rucińska; Augustina Jankauskiene; Bolesław Kalicki; Katarzyna Jobs; Marcin Tkaczyk; Janusz Feber; Mieczysław Litwin
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 3.651

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.