Literature DB >> 1511370

The National Polyp Study. Design, methods, and characteristics of patients with newly diagnosed polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

S J Winawer1, A G Zauber, M J O'Brien, L S Gottlieb, S S Sternberg, E T Stewart, J H Bond, M Schapiro, J F Panish, J D Waye.   

Abstract

The National Polyp Study (NPS) is a multicenter prospective randomized trial designed to evaluate follow-up surveillance strategies in patients who have undergone polypectomy for the control of large bowel cancer. The study design was developed by a joint research committee from American Gastroenterological Association, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and the American College of Gastroenterology. Subjects who met the eligibility criteria were randomized into two different treatment arms. Eligibility criteria included: removal of one or more adenomas; complete colonoscopy; no prior polypectomy, inflammatory bowel disease, or familial polyposis; and no history of colon cancer. The treatment arms consisted of a frequent follow-up (1 and 3 years after initial polypectomy) and a less frequent follow-up (3 years). Follow-up examinations included fecal occult blood tests, air-contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy. The latter was done on 9112 referred patients at the seven participating centers from November 1980 until February 1990 who had no history of polypectomy, colon cancer, familial polyposis, or inflammatory bowel disease. Of these patients, 4763 (52.3%) had no polyps; 549 (6.0%) had an invasive cancer; 776 (8.5%) had nonadenomatous polyps; 208 (2.3%) had incomplete examinations; 184 (2.0%) had other findings; and 2632 (28.9%) had one or more adenomas, of which 1418 (53.9%) were randomized to one of the two treatment arms. This article reports the background, rationale, objectives, methods, and organization of this study and includes patient characteristics on initial presentation. Future data provided by the NPS may help in the development of recommendations for surveillance guidelines for such patients. This study also provides a framework to address questions regarding the natural history of adenomas and their relationship with colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1511370     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920901)70:3+<1236::aid-cncr2820701508>3.0.co;2-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  30 in total

1.  Conventional colonoscopy and magnified chromoendoscopy for the endoscopic histological prediction of diminutive colorectal polyps: a single operator study.

Authors:  Giovanni-D De Palma; Maria Rega; Stefania Masone; Marcello Persico; Saverio Siciliano; Pietro Addeo; Giovanni Persico
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  CT colonography: an update.

Authors:  Andrik J Aschoff; Andrea S Ernst; Hans-Juergen Brambs; Markus S Juchems
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Association between visceral adiposity and colorectal polyps on CT colonography.

Authors:  Ronald M Summers; Jiamin Liu; Daniel L Sussman; Andrew J Dwyer; Bhavya Rehani; Perry J Pickhardt; J Richard Choi; Jianhua Yao
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Fas ligand upregulation is an early event in colonic carcinogenesis.

Authors:  M W Bennett; J O'Connell; A Houston; J Kelly; G C O'Sullivan; J K Collins; F Shanahan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  MR colonography: current status.

Authors:  Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Management of the malignant polyp.

Authors:  Marcela Ramirez; Steven Schierling; Harry T Papaconstantinou; J Scott Thomas
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

7.  Beliefs associated with fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy use at a worksite colon cancer screening program.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Victoria L Champion; Gregory N Larkin; Terrell W Zollinger; Priscilla M Gerde; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.162

8.  Epidemiology and quality control of 245 000 outpatient colonoscopies.

Authors:  Ulrich Mansmann; Alexander Crispin; Volkmar Henschel; Christine Adrion; Volker Augustin; Berndt Birkner; Axel Munte
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Screening colonoscopy in the asymptomatic 50- to 59-year-old population.

Authors:  A Mehran; P Jaffe; J Efron; A Vernava; A Vernavay; A Liberman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Colonic diverticulosis is associated with an increased adenoma detection rate in patients undergoing first-time screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Vishal B Gohil; James T Patrie; Vanessa M Shami; Bryan G Sauer; Curtis K Argo; Sheila E Crowe; Andrew Y Wang
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.