Literature DB >> 15112268

Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology and frozen section in primary parotid carcinoma.

Peter Zbären1, Michel Nuyens, Heinz Loosli, Edouard Stauffer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The low incidence and histologic heterogeneity of primary parotid carcinomas makes it difficult to evaluate the value of preoperative fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and intraoperative frozen section (FS) analysis. In the current study, the authors reviewed a single institution's experience regarding the preoperative and intraoperative diagnostic value of FNAC and FS in primary salivary gland carcinomas.
METHODS: Between January 1990 and December 2002, 108 primary parotid carcinomas were resected at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery at the University of Berne, Inselspital (Berne, Switzerland). Included in the study were a total of 101 carcinomas with preoperative FNAC results in 88 tumors and/or intraoperative FS results in 45 tumors. In a retrospective study, the results of FNAC and FS were analyzed and compared with the corresponding histopathologic diagnoses.
RESULTS: The cytologic findings were true-positive for malignancy in 63 tumors (72%), false-negative in 22 tumors (25%), and nondiagnostic in 3 tumors (3%). The tumor grading was correct in 29 of 63 tumors (46%), and the exact tumor typing was correct in 27 of 63 (43%) true-positive tumors. The FS findings were true-positive for malignancy in 43 of 45 tumors (96%), the tumor grading was correct in 35 of 45 tumors (78%), and the tumor typing was correct in 32 of 45 tumors (71%). Overall, at the time of surgery, of the 101 parotid carcinomas, the tumor was known to be malignant in 83 tumors (82%), and the correct grade and the exact tumor type were known in 55 tumors (54%) and 48 tumors (48%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: FNAC recognized malignancy in 72% of tumors, but it could not be relied upon to provide an accurate tumor grading or typing. Therefore, FNAC alone is not prone to determine the surgical management of primary parotid carcinomas. The current analysis showed the statistically significant superiority of FS compared with FNAC regarding the diagnosis of malignancy, tumor grading, and tumor typing in primary parotid carcinomas. Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15112268     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  22 in total

1.  Preoperative diagnostic of parotid gland neoplasms: fine-needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy?

Authors:  Peter Zbären; Asterios Triantafyllou; Kenneth O Devaney; Vincent Vander Poorten; Henrik Hellquist; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  [Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of head and neck tumors: possibilities, limitations, pitfalls and tips for the daily practice].

Authors:  A Agaimy; F Stelzle; J Zenk; H Iro
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  Differentiation of benign and malignant lesions of the tongue by using diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 T.

Authors:  S Li; J Cheng; Y Zhang; Z Zhang
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  A Call for Universal Acceptance of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology.

Authors:  Eric Barbarite; Sidharth V Puram; Adeeb Derakhshan; Esther D Rossi; William C Faquin; Mark A Varvares
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  [Salivary gland carcinomas Part II. Diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  S Lang; N Rotter; A Lorenzen; S Ihrler; R Eckel; D Hölzel; G Rasp; B Wollenberg; K Sommer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Fine needle aspiration cytology for parotid neoplasms: risk of malignancy through inconclusive results and lower grade tumors.

Authors:  Andrea Galli; Michele Tulli; Leone Giordano; Matteo Biafora; Davide Di Santo; Stefano Bondi; Lucia Oriella Piccioni; Mario Bussi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Parotid carcinoma: Current diagnostic workup and treatment.

Authors:  Vincent L M Vander Poorten; Francis Marchal; Sandra Nuyts; Paul M J Clement
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-11-21

8.  The value of combining conventional, diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for the diagnosis of parotid gland tumours.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Tao; Gongxin Yang; Pingzhong Wang; Yingwei Wu; Wenjing Zhu; Huimin Shi; Xin Gong; Weiqing Gao; Qiang Yu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology: The clinical impact so far. Considerations from theory to practice.

Authors:  Esther Diana Rossi; William C Faquin
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.073

10.  Cytologic grading of primary malignant salivary gland tumors: A blinded review by an international panel.

Authors:  Daniel N Johnson; Mine Onenerk; Jeffrey F Krane; Esther Diana Rossi; Zubair Baloch; Güliz Barkan; Massimo Bongiovanni; Fabiano Callegari; Sule Canberk; Glen Dixon; Andrew Field; Christopher C Griffith; Nirag Jhala; Sara Jiang; Daniel Kurtycz; Lester Layfield; Oscar Lin; Zahra Maleki; Miguel Perez-Machado; Marc Pusztaszeri; Philippe Vielh; He Wang; Matthew A Zarka; William C Faquin
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 5.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.