Literature DB >> 15111799

Biomechanical analysis of hydroxyapatite cement cranioplasty.

Damir B Matic1, Paul N Manson.   

Abstract

A recent review of the authors' experience with hydroxyapatite (HA) cement cranioplasties revealed a high infection rate. During removal of these implants, all were loose and fractured. Forty percent of these patients had a history of minor trauma at the site of cranioplasty before experiencing infection. Minor trauma may fracture HA cranioplasties and result in infection. The purpose of this study is to determine the force to fracture full- and partial-thickness cranial defects reconstructed with HA cement and to compare peak loads of differing HA cement cranioplasty techniques. Standardized craniotomy defects were created in five fresh cadaver heads. Full-thickness defects were reconstructed with either rigid or flexible titanium mesh and then covered with HA cement. Partial-thickness defects were reconstructed with HA alone. After setting, a uniaxial impact was delivered to each of the defects. Peak loads were recorded, and defects were examined for evidence of fracture.Predictable fractures of the HA cranioplasties occurred at 1200 N in all full-thickness defects reconstructed with mesh and a thin layer of HA. Implant loosening and chipping was similar to what was seen clinically in the authors' patients with infections. Full-thickness defects in which titanium mesh was shaped like a cup and filled with a thick layer of HA resist fracture at 1200 N. Partial-thickness defects reconstructed with HA alone also do not fracture at this peak load. Patient selection, defect characteristics, and reconstructive techniques are factors that need to be considered before using HA cement for cranioplasty purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15111799     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200405000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  10 in total

1.  Deformation of a Titanium Calvarial Implant following Trauma: A Case Report.

Authors:  Valerie R De Water; Ellianne J Dos Santos Rubio; Joost W Schouten; Maarten J Koudstaal
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-11-05

2.  Intraoperative template-molded bone flap reconstruction for patient-specific cranioplasty.

Authors:  Serge Marbacher; Lukas Andereggen; Salome Erhardt; Ali-Reza Fathi; Javier Fandino; Andreas Raabe; Jürgen Beck
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Immediate titanium mesh cranioplasty for treatment of postcraniotomy infections.

Authors:  Joshua J Wind; Chima Ohaegbulam; Fabio M Iwamoto; Peter M Black; John K Park
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Comparison of failure mechanisms for cements used in skeletal luting applications.

Authors:  O Clarkin; D Boyd; M R Towler
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Conditioning of 3D Printed Nanoengineered Ionic-Covalent Entanglement Scaffolds with iP-hMSCs Derived Matrix.

Authors:  Candice Sears; Eli Mondragon; Zachary I Richards; Nick Sears; David Chimene; Eoin P McNeill; Carl A Gregory; Akhilesh K Gaharwar; Roland Kaunas
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 9.933

6.  Biomaterials for craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Neumann; Kevin Kevenhoerster
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

7.  Biomaterials in skull base surgery.

Authors:  Wolfgang Maier
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-03-10

8.  Hydroxyapatite bone cement application for the reconstruction of retrosigmoid craniectomy in the treatment of cranial nerves disorders.

Authors:  Nouman Aldahak; Derrick Dupre; Mohamed Ragaee; Sebastien Froelich; Jack Wilberger; Khaled M Aziz
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-06-13

9.  Multiple Delayed Scalp Reconstruction for Complicated Cranial Defects.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Sakamoto; Eric Arnaud
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-08-11

Review 10.  Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction-An Overview.

Authors:  Victor A Vasile; Sinziana Istrate; Raluca C Iancu; Roxana M Piticescu; Laura M Cursaru; Leopold Schmetterer; Gerhard Garhöfer; Alina Popa Cherecheanu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.