Literature DB >> 15111440

Dynamic elastic modulus of porcine articular cartilage determined at two different levels of tissue organization by indentation-type atomic force microscopy.

Martin Stolz1, Roberto Raiteri, A U Daniels, Mark R VanLandingham, Werner Baschong, Ueli Aebi.   

Abstract

Cartilage stiffness was measured ex vivo at the micrometer and nanometer scales to explore structure-mechanical property relationships at smaller scales than has been done previously. A method was developed to measure the dynamic elastic modulus, |E(*)|, in compression by indentation-type atomic force microscopy (IT AFM). Spherical indenter tips (radius = approximately 2.5 microm) and sharp pyramidal tips (radius = approximately 20 nm) were employed to probe micrometer-scale and nanometer-scale response, respectively. |E(*)| values were obtained at 3 Hz from 1024 unloading response curves recorded at a given location on subsurface cartilage from porcine femoral condyles. With the microsphere tips, the average modulus was approximately 2.6 MPa, in agreement with available millimeter-scale data, whereas with the sharp pyramidal tips, it was typically 100-fold lower. In contrast to cartilage, measurements made on agarose gels, a much more molecularly amorphous biomaterial, resulted in the same average modulus for both indentation tips. From results of AFM imaging of cartilage, the micrometer-scale spherical tips resolved no fine structure except some chondrocytes, whereas the nanometer-scale pyramidal tips resolved individual collagen fibers and their 67-nm axial repeat distance. These results suggest that the spherical AFM tip is large enough to measure the aggregate dynamic elastic modulus of cartilage, whereas the sharp AFM tip depicts the elastic properties of its fine structure. Additional measurements of cartilage stiffness following enzyme action revealed that elastase digestion of the collagen moiety lowered the modulus at the micrometer scale. In contrast, digestion of the proteoglycans moiety by cathepsin D had little effect on |E(*)| at the micrometer scale, but yielded a clear stiffening at the nanometer scale. Thus, cartilage compressive stiffness is different at the nanometer scale compared to the overall structural stiffness measured at the micrometer and larger scales because of the fine nanometer-scale structure, and enzyme-induced structural changes can affect this scale-dependent stiffness differently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15111440      PMCID: PMC1304192          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74375-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  32 in total

1.  Effect of streptolysin O on the microelasticity of human platelets analyzed by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  M Walch; U Ziegler; P Groscurth
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.689

2.  Computer-controlled mechanical testing machine for small samples of biological viscoelastic materials.

Authors:  R M Aspden; T Larsson; R Svensson; D Heinegård
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1991-11

3.  Surface and subsurface morphology of bovine humeral articular cartilage as assessed by atomic force and transmission electron microscopy.

Authors:  J S Jurvelin; D J Müller; M Wong; D Studer; A Engel; E B Hunziker
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.867

4.  A technique for measuring the compressive modulus of articular cartilage under physiological loading rates with preliminary results.

Authors:  D E Shepherd; B B Seedhom
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.617

5.  [Topographic differences in the value of the 2 sec Elastic Modul in the cartilage tissue of the knee joint].

Authors:  J Popko; Z Mnich; A Wasilewski; R Latosiewicz
Journal:  Beitr Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1986-10

6.  The elastic properties of trabecular and cortical bone tissues are similar: results from two microscopic measurement techniques.

Authors:  C H Turner; J Rho; Y Takano; T Y Tsui; G M Pharr
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Nanoindentation discriminates the elastic properties of individual human bone lamellae under dry and physiological conditions.

Authors:  S Hengsberger; A Kulik; Ph Zysset
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  A triphasic theory for the swelling and deformation behaviors of articular cartilage.

Authors:  W M Lai; J S Hou; V C Mow
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation.

Authors:  J Y Rho; T Y Tsui; G M Pharr
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Indentation instrument for the measurement of cartilage stiffness under arthroscopic control.

Authors:  T Lyyra; J Jurvelin; P Pitkänen; U Väätäinen; I Kiviranta
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.242

View more
  97 in total

1.  How deeply cells feel: methods for thin gels.

Authors:  Amnon Buxboim; Karthikan Rajagopal; Andre' E X Brown; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.333

2.  Evidence and implications of inhomogeneity in tectorial membrane elasticity.

Authors:  Brett Shoelson; Emilios K Dimitriadis; Hongxue Cai; Bechara Kachar; Richard S Chadwick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Design and validation of a compressive tissue stimulator with high-throughput capacity and real-time modulus measurement capability.

Authors:  David J Salvetti; Christopher J Pino; Steven G Manuel; Ian Dallmeyer; Sanjeet V Rangarajan; Tobias Meyer; Misha Kotov; V Prasad Shastri
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.056

4.  Surface elasticity imaging of vascular tissues in a liquid environment by a scanning haptic microscope.

Authors:  Tomonori Oie; Hisato Suzuki; Yoshinobu Murayama; Toru Fukuda; Sadao Omata; Keiichi Kanda; Keiichi Takamizawa; Yasuhide Nakayama
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 1.731

5.  A novel bioreactor for the dynamic stimulation and mechanical evaluation of multiple tissue-engineered constructs.

Authors:  Trevor J Lujan; Kyle M Wirtz; Chelsea S Bahney; Steven M Madey; Brian Johnstone; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 6.  Multiscale mechanics of articular cartilage: potentials and challenges of coupling musculoskeletal, joint, and microscale computational models.

Authors:  J P Halloran; S Sibole; C C van Donkelaar; M C van Turnhout; C W J Oomens; J A Weiss; F Guilak; A Erdemir
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Bio-fabrication and physiological self-release of tissue equivalents using smart peptide amphiphile templates.

Authors:  Ricardo M Gouveia; Ian W Hamley; Che J Connon
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Micromechanical mapping of early osteoarthritic changes in the pericellular matrix of human articular cartilage.

Authors:  R E Wilusz; S Zauscher; F Guilak
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Mechanical properties of murine leukemia virus particles: effect of maturation.

Authors:  Nitzan Kol; Micha Gladnikoff; David Barlam; Roni Z Shneck; Alan Rein; Itay Rousso
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Indentation properties and glycosaminoglycan content of human menisci in the deep zone.

Authors:  John T Moyer; Ryan Priest; Troy Bouman; Adam C Abraham; Tammy L Haut Donahue
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.