Literature DB >> 15109220

Complication rates and patency of radiologically guided mushroom gastrostomy, balloon gastrostomy, and gastrojejunostomy: a review of 250 procedures.

Doris Yip1, Matthew Vanasco, Brian Funaki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare complication rates and tube performance of percutaneous mushroom gastrostomy, balloon gastrostomy, and gastrojejunostomy.
METHODS: Between September 9, 1999 and April 23, 2001, 203 patients underwent 250 radiologically guided percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy procedures. Follow-up was conducted through chart reviews and review of our interventional radiology database. Procedural and catheter-related complications were recorded. Chi-square statistical analysis was performed.
RESULTS: In patients receiving mushroom-retained gastrostomy catheters (n = 114), the major complication rate was 0.88% (n = 1), the minor complication rate was 5.3% (n = 6), and the tube complication rate was 4.4% (n = 5). In patients receiving balloon-retained gastrostomy tubes (n = 67), the major complication rate was 0, the minor complication rate was 4.5% (n = 3), and the tube complication rate was 34.3% (n = 23). In patients receiving gastrojejunostomy catheters (n = 69), the major complication rate was 1.4% (n = 1), the minor complication rate was 2.9% (n = 2), and the tube complication rate was 34.8% (n = 24). No statistically significant differences were found between procedural or peri-procedural complications among the different types of tubes. Mushroom-retained catheters had significantly fewer tube complications (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy have similar procedural and peri-procedural complication rates. Mushroom gastrostomy catheters have fewer tube-related complications compared with balloon gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy catheters. In addition, mushroom-retained catheters exhibit the best overall long-term tube patency and are therefore the gastrostomy catheter of choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15109220     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-003-0108-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  7 in total

1.  SLiC technique. A novel approach to percutaneous gastrostomy.

Authors:  A Sabnis; R Liu; B Chand; J Ponsky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Mushroom gastrostomy.

Authors:  Brian Funaki
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Comparison of fluoroscopy-guided Pull-type percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (Pull-type-PRG) with conventional percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (Push-type-PRG): clinical results in 253 patients.

Authors:  Yang Yang; J Schneider; C Düber; M B Pitton
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Percutaneous radiologically guided gastrostomy tube placement: comparison of antegrade transoral and retrograde transabdominal approaches.

Authors:  Zachary M Haber; Hearns W Charles; Jonathan S Gross; Daniel Pflager; Amy R Deipolyi
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Radiology guided antegrade GASTROSTOMY deployment of mushroom (pull type) catheters with classical and modified methods in patients with oropharyngeal, laryngeal carcinoma, and anesthesia risk.

Authors:  Süleyman Bakdık; Muharrem Keskin; Fatih Öncü; Osman Koç
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Gastrostomy tubes: Fundamentals, periprocedural considerations, and best practices.

Authors:  Anand Rajan; Peerapol Wangrattanapranee; Jonathan Kessler; Trilokesh Dey Kidambi; James H Tabibian
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-04-27

7.  Reconstructive and rehabilitating methods in patients with dysphagia and nutritional disturbances.

Authors:  Christiane Motsch
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-09-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.