Literature DB >> 15108261

Estimation of liver size for liver transplantation: the impact of age and gender.

Alexander Choukèr1, André Martignoni, Martin Dugas, Wolfgang Eisenmenger, Rolf Schauer, Ines Kaufmann, Gutav Schelling, Florian Löhe, Karl-Walter Jauch, Klaus Peter, Manfred Thiel.   

Abstract

In general, the liver is considered to be larger in males than in females. In the present study, data on liver weight from 728 legal autopsies were analyzed with respect to gender, age, body height (BH), body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), and body surface area (BSA). Descriptive statistics revealed that liver weight increases with age, reaching maximum values between 41 and 50 years in men and between 51 and 60 years in women. Thereafter, liver weight decreases again. Because this loss in liver weight starts earlier in men while liver weight continues to rise in women, the difference in liver weight between men and women is lost above the age of 50. Thus, this age defines a threshold value below which gender is expected to be a critical factor in the calculation of liver weight. When demographic data mentioned above were subjected to multiple stepwise linear regression analysis, liver weight (LW) was best predicted in younger people (16-50 years) by body weight, age, and gender: LW (g) = 452 + 16.34 x BW + 11.85 x age - 166 x gender (r(2) = 0.381; "gender": 1 = female, 0 = male). In contrast, in elderly people (51-70 years) LW was best predicted by BW and age only. Gender was not a significant factor. LW (g) = 1390 + 15.94 x BW - 12.86 x age (r(2) = 0.35). When these formulas were applied to demographic data from 97 organ donors and compared to published formulas (which, however, do not consider the age-dependent effects of gender), the new formulas best predicted male to female liver weight ratios in younger and elderly donors. In conclusion, the new formulas might better predict liver weight in organ donors and transplant recipients to avoid liver size mismatch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15108261     DOI: 10.1002/lt.20113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  27 in total

1.  Estimating liver weight of adults by body weight and gender.

Authors:  See Ching Chan; Chi Leung Liu; Chung Mau Lo; Banny K Lam; Evelyn W Lee; Yik Wong; Sheung Tat Fan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Age differences in biological monitoring of chemical exposure: a tentative description using a toxicokinetic model.

Authors:  Tomicic Catherine; Droz Pierre-Olivier
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Younger Age is an Independent Factor for Graft Weight Overestimation: Analysis of the Clinical Impact on Recipient Outcomes in 340 Japanese Living Liver Donors.

Authors:  Toshihiro Kitajima; Toshimi Kaido; Tetsuya Tajima; Tadahiro Uemura; Yasuhiro Fujimoto; Andrea Schenk; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Effects of testosterone administration (and its 5-alpha-reduction) on parenchymal organ volumes in healthy young men: findings from a dose-response trial.

Authors:  T Gagliano-Jucá; E R Tang; S Bhasin; K M Pencina; S Anderson; H Jara; Z Li; K Melamud; S L Coleman; A Aakil; R R Almeida; G Huang; T G Travison; T W Storer; S Basaria
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.842

5.  Repository Describing an Aging Population to Inform Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models Considering Anatomical, Physiological, and Biological Age-Dependent Changes.

Authors:  Felix Stader; Marco Siccardi; Manuel Battegay; Hannah Kinvig; Melissa A Penny; Catia Marzolini
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Liver function following extended hepatectomy can be accurately predicted using remnant liver volume to body weight ratio.

Authors:  Stéphanie Truant; Emmanuel Boleslawski; Géraldine Sergent; Emmanuelle Leteurtre; Alain Duhamel; Mohamed Hebbar; François-René Pruvot
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Is computed tomography volumetric assessment of the liver reliable in patients with cirrhosis?

Authors:  Claire Goumard; Fabiano Perdigao; Julien Cazejust; Stéphane Zalinski; Olivier Soubrane; Olivier Scatton
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Role of rs3846662 and HMGCR alternative splicing in statin efficacy and baseline lipid levels in familial hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Valerie Leduc; Lucienne Bourque; Judes Poirier; Robert Dufour
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Impact of estimated liver volume and liver weight on gender disparity in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Ayse L Mindikoglu; Sukru H Emre; Laurence S Magder
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Historical perspective of living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  See Ching Chan; Sheung Tat Fan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.