Literature DB >> 15107689

[Use of a job-exposure matrix for the screening of occupational exposure to asbestos].

E Imbernon1, M Goldberg, Y Spyckerell, J Steinmetz, S Bonenfant, B Fournier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: According to a recent French legislation (1995), retired people who have been exposed to an occupational carcinogen can benefit from a specific post-occupational medical follow-up program, supported by the "Caisse Primaire d'Assurance-Maladie" (CPAM), the French health insurance system. However, only very few people presently take access to this social measure. The ESPACES project developed and evaluated a procedure to identify retirees who have been exposed to asbestos during their career, and to inform them about the post-occupational medical follow-up program.
METHODS: This pilot study was performed within the health centers ("Centres d'examens de santé" (CES)) of the health insurance system in a random sample of men who have retired from the six main French administrative divisions between 1994 to 1996. A probability of exposure to asbestos was attributed through a job exposure matrix. Subjects were interviewed in the CES to validate their exposure data. Retired subjects with confirmed exposure to asbestos were referred to their CPAM, to apply for the medical follow-up. The whole process was evaluated through a comparison with control CPAMs, and simulations were performed to assess its sensitivity and specificity, as well as the total number of persons in France who could potentially benefit.
RESULTS: Among the 737 persons classified as exposed by the matrix who came to the CES, the exposure was confirmed for 53.8%, and 143 benefited from the medical follow-up, 17 times more than in a sample of control CPAMs. Based on an annual number of about 250,000 new retirees, simulations showed that a low detection threshold, taking into account the probability and duration of exposure, would yield approximately 25,000 persons coming to the CES, more 6,000 of them benefiting from the follow-up.
CONCLUSION: The proposed detection threshold would allow for a feasible and ethically acceptable generalization, due to the optimization of the false negative and false positive rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15107689     DOI: 10.1016/s0398-7620(04)99018-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique        ISSN: 0398-7620            Impact factor:   1.019


  4 in total

1.  Post-retirement surveillance of workers exposed to asbestos or wood dust: first results of the French national SPIRALE Program.

Authors:  Matthieu Carton; Sophie Bonnaud; Mélissa Nachtigal; Angel Serrano; Claudette Carole; Sébastien Bonenfant; Dominique Coste; Patrick Lepinay; Brigitte Varsat; Bertrand Wadoux; Marie Zins; Marcel Goldberg
Journal:  Epidemiol Prev       Date:  2011 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 1.901

2.  Attributable risk in men in two French case-control studies on mesothelioma and asbestos.

Authors:  Aude Lacourt; Patrick Rolland; Céline Gramond; Philippe Astoul; Soizick Chamming's; Stéphane Ducamp; Catherine Frenay; Françoise Galateau-Sallé; Anabelle Gilg Soit Ilg; Ellen Imbernon; Nolwenn Le Stang; Jean Claude Pairon; Marcel Goldberg; Yuriko Iwatsubo; Louis-Rachid Salmi; Patrick Brochard
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Not just a research method: If used with caution, can job-exposure matrices be a useful tool in the practice of occupational medicine and public health?

Authors:  Marc Fadel; Bradley A Evanoff; Johan H Andersen; Angelo d'Errico; Ann Marie Dale; Annette Leclerc; Alexis Descatha
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 5.024

4.  Modelling prevalence and incidence of fibrosis and pleural plaques in asbestos-exposed populations for screening and follow-up: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Christophe Paris; Aurélie Martin; Marc Letourneux; Pascal Wild
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 5.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.