Literature DB >> 1510759

Vaccine coverage: recent trends and future prospects.

J M White1, S J Gillam, N T Begg, C P Farrington.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of achieving the target of 95% coverage for the childhood immunisation schedule by 1995 and to determine the influence of sociodemographic factors and information systems on recent trends.
DESIGN: Analyses of trends in quarterly vaccination data for diphtheria, pertussis, and measles in health districts between February 1988 and February 1991.
SETTING: District health authorities in England and Wales, and health and social services boards in Northern Ireland.
SUBJECTS: Cohorts of children whose youngest member had reached the target age of 18 months for receiving the third doses of diphtheria and pertussis vaccines and 2 years for receiving measles vaccine.
RESULTS: Predicted coverage levels for mid-1995 were in excess of 95% for diphtheria, pertussis, and measles vaccines. In the 118 districts that continuously reported between February 1988 and February 1991 the increase in coverage was 6% for diphtheria and 13% for pertussis and measles vaccines. 1991 coverage depended primarily on 1988 coverage. The additional effects of deprivation, change in computer system, and child population size achieved at most only marginal statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: The government's target of 95% coverage by 1995 is realistic, although projections should be viewed with caution. Several national vaccination initiatives are likely to have contributed to the recent steady increase in coverage. Updating and validation exercises are likely to improve recorded coverage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1510759      PMCID: PMC1881535          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6828.682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  7 in total

1.  COVER (cover of vaccination evaluated rapidly): description of the England and Wales scheme.

Authors:  N T Begg; O N Gill; J M White
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.427

2.  Targets and the GP contract.

Authors:  M Lawrence
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-05

3.  Uptake of immunisation in district health authorities in England.

Authors:  B Jarman; N Bosanquet; P Rice; N Dollimore; B Leese
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-06-25

4.  Fact or fluke: 100% measles immunoprophylaxis in general practice.

Authors:  S K Ross
Journal:  Health Bull (Edinb)       Date:  1986-11

5.  Underprivileged areas: validation and distribution of scores.

Authors:  B Jarman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-12-08

6.  Passive smoking and cardiorespiratory health in a general population in the west of Scotland.

Authors:  D J Hole; C R Gillis; C Chopra; V M Hawthorne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-12

7.  The development of performance and cost indicators for preschool immunisation.

Authors:  E Alberman; E Watson; P Mitchell; S Day
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.791

  7 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacoeconomics of immunisation: a review.

Authors:  R van den Oever; D de Graeve; B Hepp; A Stroobant; D Walckiers; V Van Casteren; F Van Loock; G Ducoffre; J Dewatripont; P Jacques
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Data on vaccine uptake should be checked.

Authors:  J N Rao
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-04-25

3.  Immunisation, not vaccination.

Authors:  B Cooke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-16

Review 4.  Rational use of measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine.

Authors:  H Carter; H Campbell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Low immunisation uptake: is the process the problem?

Authors:  P M Harrington; C Woodman; W F Shannon
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Factors affecting uptake of measles, mumps, and rubella immunisation.

Authors:  J Li; B Taylor
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-17

7.  Primary immunisations in Liverpool. I: Who withholds consent?

Authors:  M Pearson; K Makowiecka; J Gregg; J Woollard; M Rogers; C West
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 8.  Optimal but unequitable prophylactic distribution of vaccine.

Authors:  Matt J Keeling; Andrew Shattock
Journal:  Epidemics       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.396

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.