Literature DB >> 15104542

Vasodilator stress induces infrequent wall thickening abnormalities compared to perfusion defects in mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease: implications for the choice of imaging modality with vasodilator stress.

Prem Soman1, Avijit Lahiri, Roxy Senior.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experimental evidence suggests that although vasodilator stress agents consistently induce regional flow disparity between stenosed and normal coronary vascular beds, the occurrence of functional myocardial ischemia is infrequent, especially in mild-to-moderate coronary artery stenosis. Thus, it is hypothesized that dipyridamole infusion, even at high doses, will result in a disproportionately higher frequency of perfusion defects compared to regional wall thickening abnormalities.
METHODS: We performed simultaneous high-dose (0.84 mg/kg) dipyridamole stress echocardiography (Echo) and Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT (MIBI, methoxyisobutyl isonitrile) in 46 patients with coronary artery diameter stenosis >50% and < o =90% in one or two epicardial coronary arteries, and no previous myocardial infarction.
RESULTS: Of a total of 828 segments, MIBI showed 97 reversible defects while Echo showed only 23 reversible wall thickening abnormalities. Of the 97 segments with reversible MIBI defects, only 13 (13%) showed simultaneous reversible wall thickening abnormalities during dipyridamole infusion. There were 24 patients with MIBI defects, of whom 10 (41%) showed a corresponding wall thickening abnormality. The sensitivity of MIBI and Echo for the detection of coronary artery disease was 52% and 21%, respectively (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: This suggests that vasodilator stress is not optimally suited for use with techniques that use regional wall thickening abnormality as a marker of ischemia for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15104542     DOI: 10.1111/j.0742-2822.2004.03006.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Echocardiography        ISSN: 0742-2822            Impact factor:   1.724


  3 in total

Review 1.  Stress echocardiography for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: a critical appraisal. Supported by the British Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  R Senior; M Monaghan; H Becher; J Mayet; P Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Stress Echocardiography in Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Sothinathan Gurunathan; Roxy Senior
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Feasibility of physiologist-led stress echocardiography for the assessment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Jamal N Khan; Timothy Griffiths; Tamseel Fatima; Leah Michael; Andreea Mihai; Zeeshan Mustafa; Kully Sandhu; Robert Butler; Simon Duckett; Grant Heatlie
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2017-06-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.