Literature DB >> 15104008

Inverse planning of intensity modulated proton therapy.

Simeon Nill1, Thomas Bortfeld, Uwe Oelfke.   

Abstract

A common requirement of radiation therapy is that treatment planning for different radiation modalities is devised on the basis of the same treatment planning system (TPS). The present study presents a novel multi-modal TPS with separate modules for the dose calculation, the optimization engine and the graphical user interface, which allows to integrate different treatment modalities. For heavy-charged particles, both most promising techniques, the distal edge tracking (DET) and the 3-dimensional scanning (3D) technique can be optimized. As a first application, the quality of optimized intensity-modulated treatment plans for photons (IMXT) and protons (IMPT) was analyzed in one clinical case on the basis of the achieved physical dose distributions. A comparison of the proton plans with the photon plans showed no significant improvement in terms of target volume dose, however there was an improvement in terms of organs at risk as well as a clear reduction of the total integral dose. For the DET technique, it is possible to create a treatment plan with almost the same quality of the 3D technique, however with a clearly reduced number (factor of 5) of beam spots as well as a reduced optimization time. Due to its modular design, the system can be easily expanded to more sophisticated dose-calculation algorithms or to modeling of biological effects.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15104008     DOI: 10.1078/0939-3889-00198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Med Phys        ISSN: 0939-3889            Impact factor:   4.820


  7 in total

1.  Influence of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy with different dose delivery techniques.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Yupeng Li; Xiaoqiang Li; Wenhua Cao; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiotherapy treatment of early-stage prostate cancer with IMRT and protons: a treatment planning comparison.

Authors:  Alexei Trofimov; Paul L Nguyen; John J Coen; Karen P Doppke; Robert J Schneider; Judith A Adams; Thomas R Bortfeld; Anthony L Zietman; Thomas F Delaney; William U Shipley
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Treatment planning optimisation in proton therapy.

Authors:  S E McGowan; N G Burnet; A J Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Evaluation of Dosimetric Robustness of Carbon Ion Boost Therapy for Anal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Kim Melanie Kraus; Asja Pfaffenberger; Oliver Jäkel; Jürgen Debus; Florian Sterzing
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2017-03-14

Review 5.  Effective radiotherapeutic treatment intensification in patients with pancreatic cancer: higher doses alone, higher RBE or both?

Authors:  Constantin Dreher; Daniel Habermehl; Oliver Jäkel; Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a comparative treatment planning study of photons and protons.

Authors:  Zahra Taheri-Kadkhoda; Thomas Björk-Eriksson; Simeon Nill; Jan J Wilkens; Uwe Oelfke; Karl-Axel Johansson; Peter E Huber; Marc W Münter
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  The energy margin strategy for reducing dose variation due to setup uncertainty in intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) delivered with distal edge tracking (DET).

Authors:  Miao Zhang; Ryan T Flynn; Xiaohu Mo; Thomas Rock Mackie
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.