BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatic resection has been proposed as an effective way to treat metastatic colorectal carcinoma. The aim of the study was to determine if contemporary resection of intestinal primary tumor and hepatic metastases is effective in the treatment of patients with metastases that are recognized at the initial clinical presentation of the primary tumor. METHODS: In a retrospective study, univariate and multivariate models were used to analyze the effect of patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment factors on early and long-term outcome of patients submitted to synchronous intestinal and hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. From 1988 to 1999, 78 patients underwent surgical resection of primary colorectal tumor and hepatic metastases with curative intent. Criteria for study recruitment included primary tumor controllable, no extrahepatic disease detectable, and negative surgical margins of hepatic resection. RESULTS: The univariate analysis disclosed as adverse predictors of the long-term outcome the numbers of metastases (</=3; >3), pre-operative CEA value >100 ng/ml, resection margin <10 mm, and portal nodal status. Multivariate analysis confirmed number of metastases, resection margin and portal nodal status as independent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm hepatic resection as an effective procedure when undertaking combined bowel and hepatic resection. The applicability and the outcome of this surgical strategy is definitively influenced by the chance of a radical resection of the primary tumor, the number of hepatic metastases, resection margin wider than 1 cm, positive portal nodes, and the absence of any extrahepatic metastatic disease.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatic resection has been proposed as an effective way to treat metastatic colorectal carcinoma. The aim of the study was to determine if contemporary resection of intestinal primary tumor and hepatic metastases is effective in the treatment of patients with metastases that are recognized at the initial clinical presentation of the primary tumor. METHODS: In a retrospective study, univariate and multivariate models were used to analyze the effect of patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment factors on early and long-term outcome of patients submitted to synchronous intestinal and hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. From 1988 to 1999, 78 patients underwent surgical resection of primary colorectal tumor and hepatic metastases with curative intent. Criteria for study recruitment included primary tumor controllable, no extrahepatic disease detectable, and negative surgical margins of hepatic resection. RESULTS: The univariate analysis disclosed as adverse predictors of the long-term outcome the numbers of metastases (</=3; >3), pre-operative CEA value >100 ng/ml, resection margin <10 mm, and portal nodal status. Multivariate analysis confirmed number of metastases, resection margin and portal nodal status as independent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm hepatic resection as an effective procedure when undertaking combined bowel and hepatic resection. The applicability and the outcome of this surgical strategy is definitively influenced by the chance of a radical resection of the primary tumor, the number of hepatic metastases, resection margin wider than 1 cm, positive portal nodes, and the absence of any extrahepatic metastatic disease.
Authors: Y Fong; A M Cohen; J G Fortner; W E Enker; A D Turnbull; D G Coit; A M Marrero; M Prasad; L H Blumgart; M F Brennan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: S Ambiru; M Miyazaki; T Isono; H Ito; K Nakagawa; H Shimizu; K Kusashio; S Furuya; N Nakajima Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: R Konopke; S Kersting; H Bergert; A Bloomenthal; J Gastmeier; H D Saeger; A Bunk Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Joerg-Peter Ritz; Kai S Lehmann; Christoph Reissfelder; Thomas Albrecht; Bernd Frericks; Urte Zurbuchen; Heinz J Buhr Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2005-05-05 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Simon Yang; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Erin D Kennedy; Abraham El-Sedfy; Matthew Dixon; Natalie Coburn; Alex Kiss; Calvin H L Law Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Christine E Swenson; Dieter Haemmerich; Donald H Maul; Bridget Knox; Nicole Ehrhart; Robert A Reed Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jinsoo Rhu; Jin Seok Heo; Seong Ho Choi; Dong Wook Choi; Jong Man Kim; Jae-Won Joh; Choon Hyuck David Kwon Journal: Ann Surg Treat Res Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 1.859