HYPOTHESIS: The appropriate surgical treatment of patients with colorectal cancer who are found on initial presentation to have stage IV disease is controversial. With presumed limited life expectancy, the role of primary colon or rectal resection has been questioned, as has the utility of synchronous hepatic resection. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review. SETTING: The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Ill, a tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty patients were identified through The University of Chicago Hospitals Tumor Registry whose initial presentation showed stage IV colorectal cancer and who underwent laparotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end points of the study were perioperative morbidity and mortality and overall survival. RESULTS: Median survival and 5-year survival were 14.4 months and 10%, respectively. Survival was greater for patients younger than 65 years than for those who were aged 65 years or older (18.3 vs 9.8 months; P = .007). Carcinomatosis was associated with significantly decreased survival when compared with less extensive stage IV disease (6.7 vs 18.1 months; P<.001). Patients who underwent any form of resection of hepatic metastases achieved a survival advantage over those with unresectable liver lesions (median survival, 29.6 vs 10.2 months; P<.001). Overall, 27 patients (22.5%) developed postoperative complications. Seven patients (5.8%) died during the postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: Age of 65 years or older, carcinomatosis, and extensive (bilobar) liver involvement are associated with decreased survival and increased postoperative morbidity and mortality and may negate any potential benefit patients derive from resection of the primary lesion. A substantial number of patients with synchronous hepatic metastases have protracted survival that justifies resection of the primary colorectal tumor at initial presentation. Despite the presence of stage IV disease, resection of the primary tumor and, when feasible, liver metastases is indicated.
HYPOTHESIS: The appropriate surgical treatment of patients with colorectal cancer who are found on initial presentation to have stage IV disease is controversial. With presumed limited life expectancy, the role of primary colon or rectal resection has been questioned, as has the utility of synchronous hepatic resection. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review. SETTING: The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Ill, a tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty patients were identified through The University of Chicago Hospitals Tumor Registry whose initial presentation showed stage IV colorectal cancer and who underwent laparotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end points of the study were perioperative morbidity and mortality and overall survival. RESULTS: Median survival and 5-year survival were 14.4 months and 10%, respectively. Survival was greater for patients younger than 65 years than for those who were aged 65 years or older (18.3 vs 9.8 months; P = .007). Carcinomatosis was associated with significantly decreased survival when compared with less extensive stage IV disease (6.7 vs 18.1 months; P<.001). Patients who underwent any form of resection of hepatic metastases achieved a survival advantage over those with unresectable liver lesions (median survival, 29.6 vs 10.2 months; P<.001). Overall, 27 patients (22.5%) developed postoperative complications. Seven patients (5.8%) died during the postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: Age of 65 years or older, carcinomatosis, and extensive (bilobar) liver involvement are associated with decreased survival and increased postoperative morbidity and mortality and may negate any potential benefit patients derive from resection of the primary lesion. A substantial number of patients with synchronous hepatic metastases have protracted survival that justifies resection of the primary colorectal tumor at initial presentation. Despite the presence of stage IV disease, resection of the primary tumor and, when feasible, liver metastases is indicated.
Authors: Christina Cellini; Steven R Hunt; James W Fleshman; Elisa H Birnbaum; Andrew J Bierhals; Matthew G Mutch Journal: World J Surg Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: César P Ramírez Plaza; Manuel A Cobo Dols; Alberto Gómez Portilla; Agustín de la Fuente Perucho Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: A Beham; M Rentsch; K Püllmann; L Mantouvalou; H Spatz; H J Schlitt; A Obed Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2006-11-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Louis de Mestier; Gilles Manceau; Cindy Neuzillet; Jean Baptiste Bachet; Jean Philippe Spano; Reza Kianmanesh; Jean Christophe Vaillant; Olivier Bouché; Laurent Hannoun; Mehdi Karoui Journal: World J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2014-06-15
Authors: Silke Cameron; Diana Hünerbein; Tümen Mansuroglu; Thomas Armbrust; Jens-Gerd Scharf; Harald Schwörer; László Füzesi; Giuliano Ramadori Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 4.430