Literature DB >> 15102659

Evidence that transfer of functional p53 protein results in increased apoptosis in prostate cancer.

Louis L Pisters1, Curtis A Pettaway, Patricia Troncoso, Timothy J McDonnell, L Clifton Stephens, Christopher G Wood, Kim-Anh Do, Shawn M Brisbay, Xuemei Wang, Elizabeth A Hossan, Robert B Evans, Cindy Soto, Marc G Jacobson, Karen Parker, James A Merritt, Mitchell S Steiner, Christopher J Logothetis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: INGN 201 (Ad-p53) is a replication-defective adenoviral vector that encodes a wild-type p53 gene driven by the cytomegalovirus promoter. INGN 201 has been shown to have antitumoral activity against human prostate cancer cell lines. This study was undertaken to determine the safety of INGN 201 in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer, to assess transgene expression, and to evaluate antitumoral activity. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Our study included patients with clinical stage T3, T1c-T2a with Gleason score 8-10 disease, or T2a-T2b with Gleason score 7 disease and a prostate-specific antigen level >10 ng/ml. INGN 201 was administered by intraprostatic injection under ultrasonographic guidance. One course of INGN 201 was defined as three separate INGN 201 administrations 2 weeks apart. Biopsies at baseline and 24 h after the first administration were assessed for p53 protein by immunohistochemical staining and for apoptosis by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling assay.
RESULTS: A total of 38 courses of INGN 201 gene therapy were administered to 30 patients, of whom 26 underwent radical prostatectomy. There were no grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to INGN 201 administration. Of the 11 patients with negative baseline immunostaining for p53 protein, 10 had positive p53 immunostaining after the first administration of INGN 201, and 8 had an increase in apoptotic cells by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling staining. All 26 of the patients who underwent radical prostatectomy had significant residual viable prostate cancer, and 12 have experienced biochemical failure (median follow-up, 42 months).
CONCLUSION: Intraprostatic INGN 201 gene therapy is safe and can reliably result in p53 protein production and apoptosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15102659     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-03-0388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  13 in total

1.  GLIPR1 tumor suppressor gene expressed by adenoviral vector as neoadjuvant intraprostatic injection for localized intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer preceding radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Guru Sonpavde; Timothy C Thompson; Rajul K Jain; Gustavo E Ayala; Shinji Kurosaka; Kohei Edamura; Ken-ichi Tabata; Chengzhen Ren; Alexei A Goltsov; Martha P Mims; Teresa G Hayes; Michael M Ittmann; Thomas M Wheeler; Adrian Gee; Brian J Miles; Dov Kadmon
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Combination of p53-DC vaccine and rAd-p53 gene therapy induced CTLs cytotoxic against p53-deleted human prostate cancer cells in vitro.

Authors:  H Saito; K Kitagawa; T Yoneda; Y Fukui; M Fujsawa; D Bautista; T Shirakawa
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 5.987

Review 3.  Apoptosis evasion: the role of survival pathways in prostate cancer progression and therapeutic resistance.

Authors:  Shaun McKenzie; Natasha Kyprianou
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 4.429

4.  Autoregulated expression of p53 from an adenoviral vector confers superior tumor inhibition in a model of prostate carcinoma gene therapy.

Authors:  Rodrigo Esaki Tamura; Rafael Bento da Silva Soares; Eugenia Costanzi-Strauss; Bryan E Strauss
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 4.742

5.  Nanoparticle-mediated p53 gene therapy for tumor inhibition.

Authors:  Blanka Sharma; Wenxue Ma; Isaac Morris Adjei; Jayanth Panyam; Sanja Dimitrijevic; Vinod Labhasetwar
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 6.  Considering the potential for gene-based therapy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Justin R Gregg; Timothy C Thompson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Selective biophysical interactions of surface modified nanoparticles with cancer cell lipids improve tumor targeting and gene therapy.

Authors:  Blanka Sharma; Chiranjeevi Peetla; Isaac M Adjei; Vinod Labhasetwar
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 8.679

8.  A phase I/II clinical trial in localized prostate cancer of an adenovirus expressing nitroreductase with CB1954 [correction of CB1984].

Authors:  Prashant Patel; J Graham Young; Vivien Mautner; Daniel Ashdown; Sarah Bonney; Robert G Pineda; Stuart I Collins; Peter F Searle; Diana Hull; Elizabeth Peers; John Chester; D Michael Wallace; Alan Doherty; Hing Leung; Lawrence S Young; Nicholas D James
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 9.  The role of caveolin-1 in prostate cancer: clinical implications.

Authors:  T C Thompson; S A Tahir; L Li; M Watanabe; K Naruishi; G Yang; D Kadmon; C J Logothetis; P Troncoso; C Ren; A Goltsov; S Park
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 10.  Molecular fingerprinting of radiation resistant tumors: can we apprehend and rehabilitate the suspects?

Authors:  Charles J Rosser; Micah Gaar; Stacy Porvasnik
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.