Literature DB >> 15102512

Imaging in glaucoma.

Daniel M Stein1, Gadi Wollstein, Joel S Schuman.   

Abstract

Structural assessment using the imaging technologies discussed herein provides reproducible quantitative measurements of posterior segment ocular structures. These measurements have been found to provide useful data for glaucoma detection in various regions of the posterior segment. Further studies are needed to evaluate the utility of these technologies for pre-perimetric glaucoma detection and for monitoring glaucoma progression over an extended period.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15102512      PMCID： PMC1941654          DOI： 10.1016/S0896-1549(03)00102-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmol Clin North Am        ISSN： 0896-1549


  120 in total

1.  A new method for rapid mapping of the retinal thickness at the posterior pole.

Authors:  R Zeimer; M Shahidi; M Mori; S Zou; S Asrani
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Clinical evaluation of scanning laser polarimetry: I. Intraoperator reproducibility and design of a blood vessel removal algorithm.

Authors:  A Waldock; M J Potts; J M Sparrow; W S Karwatowski
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  The effect of optic disc size on diagnostic precision with the Heidelberg retina tomograph.

Authors:  M Iester; F S Mikelberg; S M Drance
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Quantitative estimation of retinal nerve fiber layer height in glaucoma and the relationship with optic nerve head topography and visual field.

Authors:  T M Eid; G L Spaeth; L J Katz; A Azuara-Blanco; J Agusburger; J Nicholl
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Retinal thickness analysis(RTA): an objective method to assess and quantify the retinal thickness in healthy controls and in diabetics without diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Peter Fritsche; Rob van der Heijde; M S A Suttorp-Schulten; Bettine C Polak
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects.

Authors:  B C Chauhan; R P LeBlanc; T A McCormick; J B Rogers
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph.

Authors:  Bryce A Ford; Paul H Artes; Terry A McCormick; Marcelo T Nicolela; Raymond P LeBlanc; Balwantray C Chauhan
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  The nerve fiber layer in the diagnosis of glaucoma.

Authors:  A Sommer; N R Miller; I Pollack; A E Maumenee; T George
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-12

9.  Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss.

Authors:  A Sommer; J Katz; H A Quigley; N R Miller; A L Robin; R C Richter; K A Witt
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-01

10.  Scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation and optical coherence tomography in normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Harmohina Bagga; David S Greenfield; William Feuer; Robert W Knighton
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.258
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Randy H Kardon
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Discrimination between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment.

Authors:  Julio E Deleón-Ortega; Stella N Arthur; Gerald McGwin; Aiyuan Xie; Blythe E Monheit; Christopher A Girkin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Improved estimates of visual field progression using bayesian linear regression to integrate structural information in patients with ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Richard A Russell; Rizwan Malik; Balwantray C Chauhan; David P Crabb; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Variation in optical coherence tomography signal quality as an indicator of retinal nerve fibre layer segmentation error.

Authors:  Lindsey S Folio; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Richard A Bilonick; Yun Ling; Larry Kagemann; Robert J Noecker; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Effect of glaucomatous damage on repeatability of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, scanning laser polarimetry, and optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Julio E DeLeón Ortega; Lisandro M Sakata; Bobby Kakati; Gerald McGwin; Blythe E Monheit; Stella N Arthur; Christopher A Girkin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Comparison of optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry measurements in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Amanda Quelly; Han Cheng; Michal Laron; Jade S Schiffman; Rosa A Tang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Correlations between retinal nerve fiber layer and visual field in eyes with nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Julio Deleón-Ortega; Kristin E Carroll; Stella N Arthur; Christopher A Girkin
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  The effect of acute intraocular pressure elevation on peripapillary retinal thickness, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and retardance.

Authors:  Brad Fortune; Hongli Yang; Nicholas G Strouthidis; Grant A Cull; Jonathan L Grimm; J Crawford Downs; Claude F Burgoyne
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  A method to detect progression of glaucoma using the multifocal visual evoked potential technique.

Authors:  Boonchai Wangsupadilok; Vivienne C Greenstein; Fabio N Kanadani; Tomas M Grippo; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 to discriminate glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Julio E De León-Ortega; Lisandro M Sakata; Blythe E Monheit; Gerald McGwin; Stella N Arthur; Christopher A Girkin
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 5.258
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.