Literature DB >> 15102463

Why the move to microfluidics for protein analysis?

Niels Lion1, Frédéric Reymond, Hubert H Girault, Joël S Rossier.   

Abstract

There has been a recent trend towards the miniaturization of analytical tools, but what are the advantages of microfluidic devices and when is their use appropriate? Recent advances in the field of micro-analytical systems can be classified according to instrument performance (which refers here to the desired property of the analytical tool of interest) and two important features specifically related to miniaturisation, namely reduction of the sample volume and the time-to-result. Here we discuss the contribution of these different parameters and aim to highlight the factors of choice in the development and use of microfluidic devices dedicated to protein analysis.

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15102463     DOI： 10.1016/j.copbio.2004.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol        ISSN： 0958-1669            Impact factor:   9.740


  14 in total

1.  Microfluidic electrochemical immunoarray for ultrasensitive detection of two cancer biomarker proteins in serum.

Authors:  Bhaskara V Chikkaveeraiah; Vigneshwaran Mani; Vyomesh Patel; J Silvio Gutkind; James F Rusling
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 2.  Sacrificial layer microfluidic device fabrication methods.

Authors:  Bridget A Peeni; Milton L Lee; Aaron R Hawkins; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Enhanced bacterial protein expression during auto-induction obtained by alteration of lac repressor dosage and medium composition.

Authors:  Paul G Blommel; Katie J Becker; Petar Duvnjak; Brian G Fox
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2007-05-17

4.  An integrated microfluidic device for monitoring changes in nitric oxide production in single T-lymphocyte (Jurkat) cells.

Authors:  Eve C Metto; Karsten Evans; Patrick Barney; Anne H Culbertson; Dulan B Gunasekara; Giuseppe Caruso; Matthew K Hulvey; Jose Alberto Fracassi da Silva; Susan M Lunte; Christopher T Culbertson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  A large-area hemispherical perforated bead microarray for monitoring bead based aptamer and target protein interaction.

Authors:  Jong Seob Choi; Sunwoong Bae; Kyung Hoon Kim; Tae Seok Seo
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 6.  Multi-Dimensional Nanostructures for Microfluidic Screening of Biomarkers: From Molecular Separation to Cancer Cell Detection.

Authors:  Elaine Ng; Kaina Chen; Annie Hang; Abeer Syed; John X J Zhang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Microfluidic electrochemical array for detection of reactive metabolites formed by cytochrome P450 enzymes.

Authors:  Dhanuka P Wasalathanthri; Vigneshwaran Mani; Chi K Tang; James F Rusling
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Particles and microfluidics merged: perspectives of highly sensitive diagnostic detection.

Authors:  Tania Konry; Shyam Sundhar Bale; Abhinav Bhushan; Keyue Shen; Erkin Seker; Boris Polyak; Martin Yarmush
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 9.  Generation of mass tags by the inherent electrochemistry of electrospray for protein mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Christophe Roussel; Loïc Dayon; Niels Lion; Tatiana C Rohner; Jacques Josserand; Joël S Rossier; Henrik Jensen; Hubert H Girault
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.109

10.  Autoinduction of protein expression.

Authors:  Brian G Fox; Paul G Blommel
Journal:  Curr Protoc Protein Sci       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.