Literature DB >> 15102119

Looking for faces: Attention modulates early occipitotemporal object processing.

Andreas Lueschow1, Tilmann Sander, Stephan G Boehm, Guido Nolte, Lutz Trahms, Gabriel Curio.   

Abstract

Looking for somebody's face in a crowd is one of the most important examples of visual search. For this goal, attention has to be directed to a well-defined perceptual category. When this categorically selective process starts is, however, still unknown. To this end, we used magnetoencephalography (MEG) recorded over right human occipitotemporal cortex to investigate the time course of attentional modulation of perceptual processes elicited by faces and by houses. The first face-distinctive MEG response was observed at 160-170 ms (M170). Nevertheless, attention did not start to modulate face processing before 190 ms. The first house-distinctive MEG activity was also found around 160-170 ms. However, house processing was not modulated by attention before 280 ms (90 ms later than face processing). Further analysis revealed that the attentional modulation of face processing is not due to later, for example, back-propagated activation of the M170 generator. Rather, subsequent stages of occipitotemporal object processing were modulated in a category-specific manner and with preferential access to face processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15102119     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00159.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  15 in total

1.  Dissociation of face-selective cortical responses by attention.

Authors:  Maura L Furey; Topi Tanskanen; Michael S Beauchamp; Sari Avikainen; Kimmo Uutela; Riitta Hari; James V Haxby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The fusiform response to faces: explicit versus implicit processing of emotion.

Authors:  Justin F Monroe; Mark Griffin; Amy Pinkham; James Loughead; Ruben C Gur; Timothy P L Roberts; J Christopher Edgar
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Attentional and perceptual factors affecting the attentional blink for faces and objects.

Authors:  Ayelet N Landau; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Working memory load for faces modulates P300, N170, and N250r.

Authors:  Helen M Morgan; Christoph Klein; Stephan G Boehm; Kimron L Shapiro; David E J Linden
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Attention to faces modulates early face processing during low but not high face discriminability.

Authors:  Kartik K Sreenivasan; Jonathan M Goldstein; Audrey G Lustig; Luis R Rivas; Amishi P Jha
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Facial expressions of pain modulate observer's long-latency responses in superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  Miiamaaria V Kujala; Topi Tanskanen; Lauri Parkkonen; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex.

Authors:  Suzanne Dikker; Hugh Rabagliati; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-01-03

8.  Modeling Single-Trial ERP Reveals Modulation of Bottom-Up Face Visual Processing by Top-Down Task Constraints (in Some Subjects).

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Carl M Gaspar; Kacper P Wieczorek; Cyril R Pernet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-06-23

9.  The naked truth: the face and body sensitive N170 response is enhanced for nude bodies.

Authors:  Jari K Hietanen; Lauri Nummenmaa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Spatial and temporal attention modulate the early stages of face processing: behavioural evidence from a reaching paradigm.

Authors:  Genevieve L Quek; Matthew Finkbeiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.