Literature DB >> 1510115

Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of the dentate human mandible.

T W Korioth1, D P Romilly, A G Hannam.   

Abstract

The biomechanical events which accompany functional loading of the human mandible are not fully understood. The techniques normally used to record them are highly invasive. Computer modelling offers a promising alternative approach in this regard, with the additional ability to predict regional stresses and strains in inaccessible locations. In this study, we built two three-dimensional finite element (FE) models of a human mandible reconstructed from tomographs of a dry dentate jaw. The first model was used for a complete mechanical characterization of physical events. It also provided comparative data for the second model, which had an increased vertical corpus depth. In both cases, boundary conditions included rigid restraints at the first right molar and endosteal cortical surfaces of the articular eminences of temporal bones. Groups of parallel multiple vectors simulated individual masticatory muscle loads. The models were solved for displacements, stresses, strains, and forces. The simulated muscle loads in the first model deformed the mandible helically upward and toward its right (working) side. The highest principal stresses occurred at the bite point, anterior aspects of the coronoid processes, symphyseal region, and right and left sides of the mandibular corpus. In general, the observed principal stresses and strains were highest on the periosteal cortical surface and alveolar bone. At the symphyseal region, maximum principal stresses and strains were highest on the lower lingual mandibular aspect, whereas minimum principal stresses and strains were highest on its upper labial side. Subcondylar principal strains and condylar forces were higher on the left (balancing or nonbiting) side than on the right mandibular side, with condylar forces more concentrated on the anteromedial aspect of the working-side condyle and on the central and lateral aspects of the left. When compared with in vivo strain data from macaques during comparable biting events, the predictive strain values from the first model were qualitatively similar. In the second model, the reduced tensile stress on the working-side, and decreased shear stress bilaterally, confirmed that lower stresses occurred on the lower mandibular border with increased jaw depth. Our results suggested that although the mandible behaved in a beam-like manner, its corpus acted more like a combination of open and closed cross sections due to the presence of tooth sockets, at least for the task modelled.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1510115     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330880107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  29 in total

1.  Elastic anisotropy and off-axis ultrasonic velocity distribution in human cortical bone.

Authors:  Dong Hwa Chung; Paul C Dechow
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Variation in the apparent density of human mandibular bone with age and dental status.

Authors:  V J Kingsmill; A Boyde
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Finite element analysis of patient-specific condyle fracture plates: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Peter Aquilina; William C H Parr; Uphar Chamoli; Stephen Wroe
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-11-14

4.  Biomechanics of the mandible of Macaca mulatta during the power stroke of mastication: Loading, deformation, and strain regimes and the impact of food type.

Authors:  Olga Panagiotopoulou; Jose Iriarte-Diaz; Hyab Mehari Abraha; Andrea B Taylor; Simon Wilshin; Paul C Dechow; Callum F Ross
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 3.895

5.  A Biomechanical Comparison of Three 1.5-mm Plate and Screw Configurations and a Single 2.0-mm Plate for Internal Fixation of a Mandibular Condylar Fracture.

Authors:  Peter Aquilina; William C H Parr; Uphar Chamoli; Stephen Wroe; Philip Clausen
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-04-18

6.  Mineralisation density of human mandibular bone: quantitative backscattered electron image analysis.

Authors:  V J Kingsmill; A Boyde
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 7.  A review on computer-aided design and manufacturing of patient-specific maxillofacial implants.

Authors:  Afaque Rafique Memon; Enpeng Wang; Junlei Hu; Jan Egger; Xiaojun Chen
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.166

8.  Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?-A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen.

Authors:  Jan J Lang; Mirjam Bastian; Peter Foehr; Michael Seebach; Jochen Weitz; Constantin von Deimling; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Carina M Micheler; Nikolas J Wilhelm; Christian U Grosse; Marco Kesting; Rainer Burgkart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Does the flatting of the curve of spee affect the chewing force distribution in the mandible? (3D finite element study).

Authors:  Lamiaa A Hasan; Sarmad S Salih Al Qassar; Mohammad N Alrawi; Emad H Alhajar
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2021-02-19

10.  Evidence-based pain management: is the concept of integrative medicine applicable?

Authors:  Rostyslav V Bubnov
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 6.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.