Literature DB >> 15100945

Long-term follow-up study of gastric adenoma/dysplasia.

H Yamada1, M Ikegami, T Shimoda, N Takagi, M Maruyama.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The natural course of gastric adenoma/dysplasia, regarded as a precancerous lesion, is still uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1976 to 2000, 48 lesions in 43 patients (37 men, six women; mean age 59 years) were diagnosed as having gastric adenoma/dysplasia based on their first biopsies. These lesions were followed for a median of 4.7 years (mean 6 years, range 3-18 years) to evaluate the risk of progression to invasive carcinoma. Retrospectively, histological diagnoses of the biopsy and resected specimens were reclassified according to the Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia, and macroscopic changes were evaluated.
RESULTS: The diagnosis at first biopsy of the 48 lesions was low-grade adenoma/dysplasia (LGD; category 3) in 38 cases and high-grade adenoma/dysplasia (HGD; category 4) in 10 cases. Ninety-seven percent of the LGD (category 3) lesions (37 of 38) showed no histological changes during the follow-up period; the remaining lesion progressed to noninvasive carcinoma (category 4). Macroscopically, 84 % (32 of 38) of the LGD lesions (category 3) showed no remarkable changes in size, while 11 % (four of 38) shrank and 5 % (two of 38) grew larger. Nine of the 10 HGD lesions (category 4) remained histologically unchanged, while the other progressed to intramucosal carcinoma (category 5). Macroscopically, four of the 10 HGD lesions (category 4) (40 %) showed no remarkable changes in size, while the remaining six (60 %) grew larger.
CONCLUSIONS: LGD lesions (category 3) have a quite low risk of progressing to HGD or noninvasive carcinoma (category 4), and were never observed to progress to invasive carcinoma (category 5). HGD lesions (category 4) occasionally progressed to intramucosal carcinoma (category 5), with no instance of invasion into the submucosa or beyond.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15100945     DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-814330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  45 in total

1.  Can magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging be useful for low grade adenomas in preoperative biopsy specimens?

Authors:  Kazuhiro Miwa; Hisashi Doyama; Renma Ito; Hiroyoshi Nakanishi; Katsura Hirano; Satoko Inagaki; Kei Tominaga; Naohiro Yoshida; Kenichi Takemura; Shinya Yamada; Yoshibumi Kaneko; Kazuyoshi Katayanagi; Hiroshi Kurumaya; Toshihide Okada; Masakazu Yamagishi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Effects of Weipixiao (胃痞消) on Wnt pathway-associated proteins in gastric mucosal epithelial cells from rats with gastric precancerous lesions.

Authors:  Jin-hao Zeng; Hua-feng Pan; You-zhang Liu; Hai-bo Xu; Zi-ming Zhao; Hai-wen Li; Jin-ling Ren; Long-hui Chen; Xia Hu; Yan Yan
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 1.978

3.  Risk of subsequent development of gastric cancer in patients with previous gastric epithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  T Aoi; H Marusawa; T Sato; T Chiba; M Maruyama
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Gastric adenoma with low-grade dysplasia: two countries, two outcomes.

Authors:  Sun-Young Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Optimal management of biopsy-proven low-grade gastric dysplasia.

Authors:  Jung-Wook Kim; Jae Young Jang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16

6.  Endoscopic and histopathological characteristics suggesting the presence of gastric mucosal high grade neoplasia foci in cases initially diagnosed as gastric mucosal low grade neoplasia by forceps biopsy in Korea.

Authors:  Byung-Hoon Min; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Eun Ran Kim; Cheol Keun Park; Jae J Kim; Hyuk Lee; Jun Haeng Lee; Dong Kyung Chang; Young-Ho Kim; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jong Chul Rhee
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Spectrum of final pathological diagnosis of gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection.

Authors:  Kwan Woo Nam; Kyu Sang Song; Heon Young Lee; Byung Seok Lee; Jae Kyu Seong; Seok Hyun Kim; Hee Seok Moon; Eaum Seok Lee; Hyun Yong Jeong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Treatment strategy for gastric non-invasive intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy.

Authors:  Tsutomu Nishida; Shusaku Tsutsui; Motohiko Kato; Takuya Inoue; Shunsuke Yamamoto; Yoshito Hayashi; Tomofumi Akasaka; Takuya Yamada; Shinichiro Shinzaki; Hideki Iijima; Masahiko Tsujii; Tetsuo Takehara
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2011-12-15

9.  Predictors of upstage diagnosis after endoscopic resection of gastric low-grade dysplasia.

Authors:  Dae Hwan Kang; Cheol Woong Choi; Hyung Wook Kim; Su Bum Park; Su Jin Kim; Hyeong Seok Nam; Dae Gon Ryu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The risk factors for discrepancy after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric category 3 lesion (low grade dysplasia).

Authors:  Cheol Woong Choi; Hyung Wook Kim; Dong Hoon Shin; Dae Hwan Kang; Yong Mi Hong; Jin Hyun Park; Su Bum Park; Mong Cho; Jung Hee Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.