Literature DB >> 15100792

Enhancement of microfluidic mixing using time pulsing.

Ian Glasgow1, Nadine Aubry.   

Abstract

Many microfluidic applications require the mixing of reagents, but efficient mixing in these laminar (i.e., low Reynolds number) systems is typically difficult. Instead of using complex geometries and/or relatively long channels, we demonstrate the merits of flow rate time dependency through periodic forcing. We illustrate the technique by studying mixing in a simple "T" channel intersection by means of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) as well as physically mixing two aqueous reagents. The "T" geometry selected consists of two inlet channel segments merging at 90 degrees to each other, the outlet segment being an extension of one of the inlet segments. All channel segments are 200 microm wide by 120 microm deep, a practical scale for mass-produced disposable devices. The flow rate and average velocity after the confluence of the two reagents are 48 nl s(-1) and 2 mm s(-1) respectively, which, for aqueous solutions at room temperature, corresponds to a Reynolds number of 0.3. We use a mass diffusion constant of 10(-10) m(2) s(-1), typical of many BioMEMS applications, and vary the flow rates of the reagents such that the average flow rate remains unchanged but the instantaneous flow rate is sinusoidal (with a DC bias) with respect to time. We analyze the effect of pulsing the flow rate in one inlet only as well as in the two inlets, and demonstrate that the best results occur when both inlets are pulsed out of phase. In this case, the interface is shown to stretch, retain one fold, and sweep through the confluence zone, leading to good mixing within 2 mm downstream of the confluence, i.e. about 1 s of contact. From a practical viewpoint, the case where the inlets are 180 degrees out of phase is of particular interest as the outflow is constant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15100792     DOI: 10.1039/b302569a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Chip        ISSN: 1473-0189            Impact factor:   6.799


  20 in total

1.  Novel index for micromixing characterization and comparative analysis.

Authors:  Mranal Jain; K Nandakumar
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Mixing enhancement in microfluidic channel with a constriction under periodic electro-osmotic flow.

Authors:  Chun Yee Lim; Yee Cheong Lam; Chun Yang
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Computerized microfluidic cell culture using elastomeric channels and Braille displays.

Authors:  Wei Gu; Xiaoyue Zhu; Nobuyuki Futai; Brenda S Cho; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  An unsteady microfluidic T-form mixer perturbed by hydrodynamic pressure.

Authors:  Yanbao Ma; Chien-Pin Sun; Michael Fields; Yang Li; David A Haake; Bernard M Churchill; Chih-Ming Ho
Journal:  J Micromech Microeng       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 1.881

Review 5.  Controlling mass transport in microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Jason S Kuo; Daniel T Chiu
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 10.745

6.  Microfluidic mixing for sperm activation and motility analysis of pearl Danio zebrafish.

Authors:  Daniel S Park; Robert A Egnatchik; Hali Bordelon; Terrence R Tiersch; W Todd Monroe
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Module-Fluidics: Building Blocks for Spatio-Temporal Microenvironment Control.

Authors:  Bowen Ling; Ilenia Battiato
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 3.523

8.  Modeling fluorescence recovery after photobleaching in loaded bone: potential applications in measuring fluid and solute transport in the osteocytic lacunar-canalicular system.

Authors:  Xiaozhou Zhou; John E Novotny; Liyun Wang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Mixing in microfluidic devices and enhancement methods.

Authors:  Kevin Ward; Z Hugh Fan
Journal:  J Micromech Microeng       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 1.881

10.  Biophysical micromixer.

Authors:  Chin-Tsan Wang; Yuh-Chung Hu; Tzu-Yang Hu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.