OBJECTIVE: Artifacts from gas bubble formation during radio frequency ablation along with the poor intrinsic contrast between normal and treated regions (zone of necrosis) are considerable problems for the visualization of the necrotic region on conventional sonography. Sonographic elastography is very effective for visualizing the zone of necrosis, but it uses the same echo signals to estimate strain as those used to form gray scale images. Thus, the impact of gas bubbles on strain images or elastograms must be investigated. METHODS: Radio frequency ablation was performed in vitro on liver tissue samples, approximately 40 x 40 x 20 mm, encased in 80-mm cubed gelatin phantoms. Elastograms generated at different instants during the ablation procedures were obtained on a real-time scanner with a 5-MHz linear array. Sequences of elastograms illustrate the growth of the thermal lesion. RESULTS: Degradation of the distal boundary of the thermal lesion was observed. The degradation was confined to the lower-fifth quadrant of the thermal lesion. However, accurate estimates of lesion areas could still be obtained by extrapolation of the thermal lesion boundary. CONCLUSIONS: Elastograms of thermal lesions in vitro can be obtained during radio frequency ablation. Some loss of thermal lesion boundary information on strain images was observed in regions where attenuation due to gas bubbles reduced the signal-noise ratio of the echo signals.
OBJECTIVE: Artifacts from gas bubble formation during radio frequency ablation along with the poor intrinsic contrast between normal and treated regions (zone of necrosis) are considerable problems for the visualization of the necrotic region on conventional sonography. Sonographic elastography is very effective for visualizing the zone of necrosis, but it uses the same echo signals to estimate strain as those used to form gray scale images. Thus, the impact of gas bubbles on strain images or elastograms must be investigated. METHODS: Radio frequency ablation was performed in vitro on liver tissue samples, approximately 40 x 40 x 20 mm, encased in 80-mm cubed gelatin phantoms. Elastograms generated at different instants during the ablation procedures were obtained on a real-time scanner with a 5-MHz linear array. Sequences of elastograms illustrate the growth of the thermal lesion. RESULTS: Degradation of the distal boundary of the thermal lesion was observed. The degradation was confined to the lower-fifth quadrant of the thermal lesion. However, accurate estimates of lesion areas could still be obtained by extrapolation of the thermal lesion boundary. CONCLUSIONS: Elastograms of thermal lesions in vitro can be obtained during radio frequency ablation. Some loss of thermal lesion boundary information on strain images was observed in regions where attenuation due to gas bubbles reduced the signal-noise ratio of the echo signals.
Authors: Paul F Laeseke; Lisa A Sampson; Dieter Haemmerich; Christopher L Brace; Jason P Fine; Tina M Frey; Thomas C Winter; Fred T Lee Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-08-23 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Wenjun Yang; Tomy Varghese; Timothy Ziemlewicz; Marci Alexander; Meghan Lubner; James Louis Hinshaw; Shane Wells; Fred T Lee Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2017-06-05 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Timothy J Ziemlewicz; J Louis Hinshaw; Meghan G Lubner; Emily A Knott; Bridgett J Willey; Fred T Lee; Christopher L Brace Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2020 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Wenjun Yang; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Tomy Varghese; Marci L Alexander; Nicholas Rubert; Atul N Ingle; Meghan G Lubner; James L Hinshaw; Shane A Wells; Fred T Lee; James A Zagzebski Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Swetha Subramanian; Steven M Rudich; Amel Alqadah; Chandra Priya Karunakaran; Marepalli B Rao; T Douglas Mast Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: S van Esser; G Stapper; P J van Diest; M A A J van den Bosch; J H G M Klaessens; W P Th M Mali; I H M Borel Rinkes; R van Hillegersberg Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 5.344