Literature DB >> 15095824

Using cartilage to repair bone: an alternative approach in tissue engineering.

D Montufar-Solis1, H C Nguyen, H D Nguyen, W N Horn, D D Cody, P J Duke.   

Abstract

Materials and techniques currently used for bone replacement/repair conform to the current paradigm, relying on bone or bone products to produce bone or induce bone formation. Yet, nature forms and heals most of the skeleton by ossification of a cartilaginous model. In this study, we cultured aggregates of E10.5 or E12 mouse embryonic limb cells in the bioreactor for 3 weeks, determined the stages of cartilage differentiation attained, and assessed the ossification and bone healing potential of the spheroids by implantation adjacent to, or directly in, a skull defect. Cultured spheroids had large cartilaginous areas, sometimes with cellular arrangements characteristic of growth plate zones. Aggregates implanted for 2 weeks adjacent to a defect mineralized and ossified (histology, micro-CT). Defects with implants had a central mass of differentiated and differentiating bone, with osteoclast activity, filling the defect. Controls had considerable remodeling on the bone edges demarcating the still present defect. This study shows that cartilage, grown in the bioreactor for 3 weeks, ossified when implanted adjacent to a bone defect, and when implanted directly in a defect, contributed to its healing. Our ability to grow differentiated bone-forming cartilage for implantation is an alternative approach in the field of bone repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15095824     DOI: 10.1023/b:abme.0000017546.29064.fc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  6 in total

1.  Design and evaluation of collagen-inspired mineral-hydrogel nanocomposites for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Akhil Patel; Samer H Zaky; Karen Schoedel; Hongshuai Li; Vinayak Sant; Elia Beniash; Charles Sfeir; Donna B Stolz; Shilpa Sant
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 2.  Endochondral ossification for enhancing bone regeneration: converging native extracellular matrix biomaterials and developmental engineering in vivo.

Authors:  S Connor Dennis; Cory J Berkland; Lynda F Bonewald; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Dual functional selenium-substituted hydroxyapatite.

Authors:  Yanhua Wang; Jun Ma; Lei Zhou; Jin Chen; Yonghui Liu; Zhiye Qiu; Shengmin Zhang
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  CORRELATION BETWEEN MICRO-CT SECTIONS AND HISTOLOGICAL SECTIONS OF MOUSE SKULL DEFECTS IMPLANTED WITH ENGINEERED CARTILAGE.

Authors:  P J Duke; L Doan; H Luong; C Kelley; W Leboeuf; Q Diep; E Johnson; D D Cody
Journal:  Gravit Space Biol Bull       Date:  2009-09

5.  Engineering endochondral bone: in vivo studies.

Authors:  Serafim M Oliveira; Dindo Q Mijares; Gloria Turner; Isabel F Amaral; Mário A Barbosa; Cristina C Teixeira
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Bone-forming capacity of adult human nasal chondrocytes.

Authors:  Benjamin E Pippenger; Manuela Ventura; Karoliina Pelttari; Sandra Feliciano; Claude Jaquiery; Arnaud Scherberich; X Frank Walboomers; Andrea Barbero; Ivan Martin
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 5.310

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.