Literature DB >> 25336144

Endochondral ossification for enhancing bone regeneration: converging native extracellular matrix biomaterials and developmental engineering in vivo.

S Connor Dennis1,2, Cory J Berkland1,2,3, Lynda F Bonewald4, Michael S Detamore1,2.   

Abstract

Autologous bone grafting (ABG) remains entrenched as the gold standard of treatment in bone regenerative surgery. Consequently, many marginally successful bone tissue engineering strategies have focused on mimicking portions of ABG's "ideal" osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic composition resembling the late reparative stage extracellular matrix (ECM) in bone fracture repair, also known as the "hard" or "bony" callus. An alternative, less common approach that has emerged in the last decade harnesses endochondral (EC) ossification through developmental engineering principles, which acknowledges that the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in developmental skeletogenesis, specifically EC ossification, are closely paralleled during native bone healing. EC ossification naturally occurs during the majority of bone fractures and, thus, can potentially be utilized to enhance bone regeneration for nearly any orthopedic indication, especially in avascular critical-sized defects where hypoxic conditions favor initial chondrogenesis instead of direct intramembranous ossification. The body's native EC ossification response, however, is not capable of regenerating critical-sized defects without intervention. We propose that an underexplored potential exists to regenerate bone through the native EC ossification response by utilizing strategies which mimic the initial inflammatory or fibrocartilaginous ECM (i.e., "pro-" or "soft" callus) observed in the early reparative stage of bone fracture repair. To date, the majority of strategies utilizing this approach rely on clinically burdensome in vitro cell expansion protocols. This review will focus on the confluence of two evolving areas, (1) native ECM biomaterials and (2) developmental engineering, which will attempt to overcome the technical, business, and regulatory challenges that persist in the area of bone regeneration. Significant attention will be given to native "raw" materials and ECM-based designs that provide necessary osteo- and chondro-conductive and inductive features for enhancing EC ossification. In addition, critical perspectives on existing stem cell-based therapeutic strategies will be discussed with a focus on their use as an extension of the acellular ECM-based designs for specific clinical indications. Within this framework, a novel realm of unexplored design strategies for bone tissue engineering will be introduced into the collective consciousness of the regenerative medicine field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25336144      PMCID: PMC4442558          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2014.0419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev        ISSN: 1937-3368            Impact factor:   6.389


  114 in total

1.  Optimization of an in vitro three-dimensional microenvironment to reprogram synovium-derived stem cells for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jingting Li; Ming Pei
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Design of ceramic-based cements and putties for bone graft substitution.

Authors:  M Bohner
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.942

Review 3.  Stem cells from adipose tissue allow challenging new concepts for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Marco N Helder; Marlene Knippenberg; Jenneke Klein-Nulend; Paul I J M Wuisman
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2007-08

4.  Stem cell-derived endochondral cartilage stimulates bone healing by tissue transformation.

Authors:  Chelsea S Bahney; Diane P Hu; Aaron J Taylor; Federico Ferro; Hayley M Britz; Benedikt Hallgrimsson; Brian Johnstone; Theodore Miclau; Ralph S Marcucio
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Engineered cartilage heals skull defects.

Authors:  Lan Doan; Connor Kelley; Heather Luong; Jeryl English; Hector Gomez; Evan Johnson; Dianna Cody; Pauline Jackie Duke
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 6.  Comparative review of growth factors for induction of three-dimensional in vitro chondrogenesis in human mesenchymal stem cells isolated from bone marrow and adipose tissue.

Authors:  Jennifer L Puetzer; John N Petitte; Elizabeth G Loboa
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.389

7.  Premature induction of hypertrophy during in vitro chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells correlates with calcification and vascular invasion after ectopic transplantation in SCID mice.

Authors:  Karoliina Pelttari; Anja Winter; Eric Steck; Katrin Goetzke; Thea Hennig; Bjoern Gunnar Ochs; Thomas Aigner; Wiltrud Richter
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-10

8.  Engineering osteochondral constructs through spatial regulation of endochondral ossification.

Authors:  Eamon J Sheehy; Tatiana Vinardell; Conor T Buckley; Daniel J Kelly
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Critical Steps toward a tissue-engineered cartilage implant using embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Jojanneke M Jukes; Lorenzo Moroni; Clemens A van Blitterswijk; Jan de Boer
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  The science of fracture healing.

Authors:  Thomas A Einhorn
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  From Skeletal Development to Tissue Engineering: Lessons from the Micromass Assay.

Authors:  Darinka D Klumpers; David J Mooney; Theo H Smit
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Design and evaluation of collagen-inspired mineral-hydrogel nanocomposites for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Akhil Patel; Samer H Zaky; Karen Schoedel; Hongshuai Li; Vinayak Sant; Elia Beniash; Charles Sfeir; Donna B Stolz; Shilpa Sant
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Superior calvarial bone regeneration using pentenoate-functionalized hyaluronic acid hydrogels with devitalized tendon particles.

Authors:  Jakob M Townsend; Brian T Andrews; Yi Feng; Jinxi Wang; Randolph J Nudo; Erik Van Kampen; Stevin H Gehrke; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Evaluation of an Engineered Hybrid Matrix for Bone Regeneration via Endochondral Ossification.

Authors:  Paiyz E Mikael; Aleksandra A Golebiowska; Xiaonan Xin; David W Rowe; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Colloidal Gels with Extracellular Matrix Particles and Growth Factors for Bone Regeneration in Critical Size Rat Calvarial Defects.

Authors:  Jakob M Townsend; S Connor Dennis; Jonathan Whitlow; Yi Feng; Jinxi Wang; Brian Andrews; Randolph J Nudo; Michael S Detamore; Cory J Berkland
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite-poly(thioketal urethane) nanocomposites stimulate a combined intramembranous and endochondral ossification response in rabbits.

Authors:  Madison A P McGough; Lauren A Boller; Dustin M Groff; Jonathan G Schoenecker; Jeffry S Nyman; Joseph C Wenke; Cheyenne Rhodes; Dan Shimko; Craig L Duvall; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2019-12-10

7.  Converting 2D Nanofiber Membranes to 3D Hierarchical Assemblies with Structural and Compositional Gradients Regulates Cell Behavior.

Authors:  Shixuan Chen; Alec McCarthy; Johnson V John; Yajuan Su; Jingwei Xie
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 30.849

8.  Controlled Release of Vanadium from a Composite Scaffold Stimulates Mesenchymal Stem Cell Osteochondrogenesis.

Authors:  S D Schussler; K Uske; P Marwah; F W Kemp; J D Bogden; S S Lin; Treena Livingston Arinzeh
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  Perfusion Enhances Hypertrophic Chondrocyte Matrix Deposition, But Not the Bone Formation.

Authors:  Jonathan C Bernhard; Elizabeth Hulphers; Bernhard Rieder; James Ferguson; Dominik Rünzler; Thomas Nau; Heinz Redl; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Polymeric nanofibrous scaffolds laden with cell-derived extracellular matrix for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Radoslaw Junka; Xiaojun Yu
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 7.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.