A A Jarquin-Valdivia1, J McCartney, D Palestrant, S C Johnston, D Gress. 1. Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, Vascular Ultrasound Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, USA. adrian.a.jarquin-valdivia@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The difficult transtemporal ultrasound window is a relatively frequent occurrence. The authors assessed if the thickness of the temporal bone squama as measured in the "bone window" of the head computerized tomography (CT) scan can predict the transtemporal acoustic window. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the head CTs on their bone window setting of patients in which nonimaging transcranial Dopplers (TCDs) had been performed. The thickness of the temporal squama in its thinnest portion was measured. The temporal TCD windows were graded in three classes: class 1 as good, class 2 when only a partial study is possible, and class 3 as an impossible ultrasonic window. In a case-control design, for every patient with any class 2 and 3 TCD temporal window, a patient with a class 1 window was randomly included from the same time period. RESULTS: Fifty-five temporal bones (56%) were class 1, 17 (17%) were class 2, and 27 (27%) were class 3. Bone thicknesses (in mm, mean +/- SD) were greater in those with poorer windows: class 1 = 2.67 +/- 0.70, class 2 = 4.06 +/- 0.56, and class 3 = 5.04 +/- 1.06, P < or = .0001 by Cusick's nonparametric test of trend. Temporal squama thickness of > or = 5 mm portends 86% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 70% positive predictive value, and a positive likelihood ratio of 8.6 for a class 3 transtemporal ultrasound window. CONCLUSION: Measurement of temporal bone thickness on the bone window setting of the head CT scan may be useful in identifying patients who are poor candidates for transcranial ultrasound.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The difficult transtemporal ultrasound window is a relatively frequent occurrence. The authors assessed if the thickness of the temporal bone squama as measured in the "bone window" of the head computerized tomography (CT) scan can predict the transtemporal acoustic window. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the head CTs on their bone window setting of patients in which nonimaging transcranial Dopplers (TCDs) had been performed. The thickness of the temporal squama in its thinnest portion was measured. The temporal TCD windows were graded in three classes: class 1 as good, class 2 when only a partial study is possible, and class 3 as an impossible ultrasonic window. In a case-control design, for every patient with any class 2 and 3 TCD temporal window, a patient with a class 1 window was randomly included from the same time period. RESULTS: Fifty-five temporal bones (56%) were class 1, 17 (17%) were class 2, and 27 (27%) were class 3. Bone thicknesses (in mm, mean +/- SD) were greater in those with poorer windows: class 1 = 2.67 +/- 0.70, class 2 = 4.06 +/- 0.56, and class 3 = 5.04 +/- 1.06, P < or = .0001 by Cusick's nonparametric test of trend. Temporal squama thickness of > or = 5 mm portends 86% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 70% positive predictive value, and a positive likelihood ratio of 8.6 for a class 3 transtemporal ultrasound window. CONCLUSION: Measurement of temporal bone thickness on the bone window setting of the head CT scan may be useful in identifying patients who are poor candidates for transcranial ultrasound.
Authors: Samantha K Rowbotham; Calvin G Mole; Diana Tieppo; Magda Blaszkowska; Stephen M Cordner; Soren Blau Journal: Int J Legal Med Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 2.686
Authors: Vijay K Sharma; N Venketasubramanian; Dheeraj K Khurana; Georgios Tsivgoulis; Andrei V Alexandrov Journal: Ann Indian Acad Neurol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 1.714
Authors: Azzdine Y Ammi; T Douglas Mast; I-Hua Huang; Todd A Abruzzo; Constantin-C Coussios; George J Shaw; Christy K Holland Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2008-05-23 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Vojtech Novotny; Aliona Nacu; Christopher E Kvistad; Annette Fromm; Gesche F Neckelmann; Andrej N Khanevski; Haakon Tobro; Ulrike Waje-Andreassen; Halvor Naess; Lars Thomassen; Nicola Logallo Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2017-11-08 Impact factor: 6.829
Authors: Alejandro M Brunser; Claudio Silva; Daniel Cárcamo; Paula Muñoz; Arnold Hoppe; Verónica V Olavarría; Violeta Díaz; Juan Abarca Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 2.708