Literature DB >> 15095559

The thickness of the temporal squama and its implication for transcranial sonography.

A A Jarquin-Valdivia1, J McCartney, D Palestrant, S C Johnston, D Gress.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The difficult transtemporal ultrasound window is a relatively frequent occurrence. The authors assessed if the thickness of the temporal bone squama as measured in the "bone window" of the head computerized tomography (CT) scan can predict the transtemporal acoustic window.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the head CTs on their bone window setting of patients in which nonimaging transcranial Dopplers (TCDs) had been performed. The thickness of the temporal squama in its thinnest portion was measured. The temporal TCD windows were graded in three classes: class 1 as good, class 2 when only a partial study is possible, and class 3 as an impossible ultrasonic window. In a case-control design, for every patient with any class 2 and 3 TCD temporal window, a patient with a class 1 window was randomly included from the same time period.
RESULTS: Fifty-five temporal bones (56%) were class 1, 17 (17%) were class 2, and 27 (27%) were class 3. Bone thicknesses (in mm, mean +/- SD) were greater in those with poorer windows: class 1 = 2.67 +/- 0.70, class 2 = 4.06 +/- 0.56, and class 3 = 5.04 +/- 1.06, P < or = .0001 by Cusick's nonparametric test of trend. Temporal squama thickness of > or = 5 mm portends 86% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 70% positive predictive value, and a positive likelihood ratio of 8.6 for a class 3 transtemporal ultrasound window.
CONCLUSION: Measurement of temporal bone thickness on the bone window setting of the head CT scan may be useful in identifying patients who are poor candidates for transcranial ultrasound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15095559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroimaging        ISSN: 1051-2284            Impact factor:   2.486


  7 in total

1.  Average thickness of the bones of the human neurocranium: development of reference measurements to assist with blunt force trauma interpretations.

Authors:  Samantha K Rowbotham; Calvin G Mole; Diana Tieppo; Magda Blaszkowska; Stephen M Cordner; Soren Blau
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 2.  Role of transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in acute stroke.

Authors:  Vijay K Sharma; N Venketasubramanian; Dheeraj K Khurana; Georgios Tsivgoulis; Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.714

3.  Characterization of ultrasound propagation through ex-vivo human temporal bone.

Authors:  Azzdine Y Ammi; T Douglas Mast; I-Hua Huang; Todd A Abruzzo; Constantin-C Coussios; George J Shaw; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Clinical Importance of Temporal Bone Features for the Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Sonothrombolysis: a Retrospective Analysis of the NOR-SASS Trial.

Authors:  Vojtech Novotny; Aliona Nacu; Christopher E Kvistad; Annette Fromm; Gesche F Neckelmann; Andrej N Khanevski; Haakon Tobro; Ulrike Waje-Andreassen; Halvor Naess; Lars Thomassen; Nicola Logallo
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 6.829

5.  Transcranial Doppler in a Hispanic-Mestizo population with neurological diseases: a study of sonographic window and its determinants.

Authors:  Alejandro M Brunser; Claudio Silva; Daniel Cárcamo; Paula Muñoz; Arnold Hoppe; Verónica V Olavarría; Violeta Díaz; Juan Abarca
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  A New Methodology of Viewing Extra-Axial Fluid and Cortical Abnormalities in Children with Autism via Transcranial Ultrasonography.

Authors:  James Jeffrey Bradstreet; Stefania Pacini; Marco Ruggiero
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Factors affecting transtemporal window quality in transcranial sonography.

Authors:  Lei He; Dong-Fang Wu; Jing-Han Zhang; Shuai Zheng; Yi Li; Wen He
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 3.405

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.