Literature DB >> 15091135

Assessment of automatic vessel tracking techniques in preoperative planning of transluminal aortic stent graft implantation.

Daniel T Boll1, Jonathan S Lewin, Jeffrey L Duerk, Dava Smith, Krishna Subramanyan, Elmar M Merkle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate automatic vessel tracking techniques in the course of preoperative planning prior to transluminal aortic endograft implantation by comparing accuracy, reproducibility, and postprocessing time with source image and volume-rendered analysis methods.
METHODS: Multislice computed tomography datasets of 5 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms were preoperatively examined, performing volumetric analysis of diameter and position of renal artery orifices, aneurysmal neck, maximal aneurysmal extension, aortic bifurcation, and iliac arteries and bifurcation. Analysis was realized by utilizing transverse datasets, volume rendering, and automated vessel tracking strategies (MxView, Philips, Best, The Netherlands). Measurement techniques were evaluated by 2 independent readers 3 times for each patient and measurement modality. Statistical analysis evaluated accuracy of the measurements and intra- and interobserver reliability. Postprocessing time was documented.
RESULTS: Using transverse source datasets, intraobserver reliability ranged from 0.49 to 0.58. Intraobserver reliability improved to 0.7 to 0.98 when volume-rendered datasets were evaluated. Interobserver variability for transverse and volume-rendered datasets ranged from 0.49 to 0.76 and 0.70 to 0.96, respectively. Automated vessel tracking datasets did not demonstrate any intra- or interobserver variability. Based on transverse datasets, the length and diameter of iliac arteries and location and diameter of the aneurysmal neck were measured as statistically different in all cases in contrast to volume rendering and automated segmentation techniques. Postprocessing time consumption for measurements based on transverse, volume-rendered, and automated tracking segmentation datasets averaged 3.32 minutes, 25.43 minutes, and 2.24 minutes, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative measurements improve significantly if datasets are evaluated based on volume-rendering techniques. This time-consuming procedure can be shortened, while further reducing observer variability, with automatic segmentation techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15091135     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200403000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  6 in total

1.  Sizing for endovascular aneurysm repair: clinical evaluation of a new automated three-dimensional software.

Authors:  Adrien Kaladji; Antoine Lucas; Gaëlle Kervio; Pascal Haigron; Alain Cardon
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.466

2.  ACCF/AHA 2007 Clinical Competence Statement on vascular imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Christopher M Kramer; Matthew J Budoff; Zahi A Fayad; Victor A Ferrari; Corey Goldman; John R Lesser; Edward T Martin; Sanjay Rajagopalan; John P Reilly; George P Rodgers; Lawrence Wechsler
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.239

3.  Automated multidetector row CT dataset segmentation with an interactive watershed transform (IWT) algorithm: Part 1. Understanding the IWT technique.

Authors:  David G Heath; Horst K Hahn; Pamela T Johnson; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  An overview on the advances in cardiovascular interventional MR imaging.

Authors:  Olaf Saborowski; Maythem Saeed
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 5.  MR fluoroscopy in vascular and cardiac interventions (review).

Authors:  Maythem Saeed; Steve W Hetts; Joey English; Mark Wilson
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Comparability of semiautomatic tortuosity measurements in the carotid artery.

Authors:  Evelien E de Vries; Vanessa E C Pourier; Constance J H C M van Laarhoven; Evert J Vonken; Joost A van Herwaarden; Gert J de Borst
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.804

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.