OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between packed red blood cell transfusion practice and the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a multicentered, prospective observational study of transfusion practice in intensive care units in the United States. SETTING: A total of 284 intensive care units in the United States were studied from August 2000 to April 2001. PATIENTS: Patients without pneumonia at intensive care unit admission and who then required at least 48 hrs of mechanical ventilation were considered at risk for VAP. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: VAP was diagnosed based on prospectively defined clinical criteria and represented the primary study end point. Late-onset VAP (VAP arising after > or =5 days of mechanical ventilation) represented a secondary end point. Transfusions given during the intensive care unit stay and before the onset of VAP were tracked prospectively. Of 4,892 subjects in the original cohort, 1,518 received mechanical ventilation of > or =48 hrs and did not have preexisting pneumonia. VAP was diagnosed in 311 (20.5%) patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that transfusion independently increased the risk for VAP (odds ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-2.68). Other factors increasing the risk for VAP included male sex (odds ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.15-2.07), admission after trauma (odds ratio, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.15-2.47), use of continuous sedation (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.07-1.92), and type of nutritional support (e.g., early enteral nutrition: odds ratio, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.93-3.63; total parenteral nutrition: odds ratio, 3.27; 95% CI, 2.24-4.75). The effect of transfusion on late-onset VAP was more pronounced (odds ratio, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.27-3.66) and demonstrated a positive dose-response relationship (p =.0223 for trend test). CONCLUSIONS: Transfusion of packed red blood cells increases the risk of developing VAP. Avoiding the unnecessary use of packed red blood cell transfusions may decrease the occurrence of VAP.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between packed red blood cell transfusion practice and the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a multicentered, prospective observational study of transfusion practice in intensive care units in the United States. SETTING: A total of 284 intensive care units in the United States were studied from August 2000 to April 2001. PATIENTS: Patients without pneumonia at intensive care unit admission and who then required at least 48 hrs of mechanical ventilation were considered at risk for VAP. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: VAP was diagnosed based on prospectively defined clinical criteria and represented the primary study end point. Late-onset VAP (VAP arising after > or =5 days of mechanical ventilation) represented a secondary end point. Transfusions given during the intensive care unit stay and before the onset of VAP were tracked prospectively. Of 4,892 subjects in the original cohort, 1,518 received mechanical ventilation of > or =48 hrs and did not have preexisting pneumonia. VAP was diagnosed in 311 (20.5%) patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that transfusion independently increased the risk for VAP (odds ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-2.68). Other factors increasing the risk for VAP included male sex (odds ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.15-2.07), admission after trauma (odds ratio, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.15-2.47), use of continuous sedation (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.07-1.92), and type of nutritional support (e.g., early enteral nutrition: odds ratio, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.93-3.63; total parenteral nutrition: odds ratio, 3.27; 95% CI, 2.24-4.75). The effect of transfusion on late-onset VAP was more pronounced (odds ratio, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.27-3.66) and demonstrated a positive dose-response relationship (p =.0223 for trend test). CONCLUSIONS: Transfusion of packed red blood cells increases the risk of developing VAP. Avoiding the unnecessary use of packed red blood cell transfusions may decrease the occurrence of VAP.
Authors: Javier Hortal; Maddalena Giannella; Maria Jesús Pérez; José Maria Barrio; Manuel Desco; Emilio Bouza; Patricia Muñoz Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-06-26 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Raphael C Sun; Anna M Button; Brian J Smith; Richard F Leblond; James R Howe; James J Mezhir Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: David J Murphy; David Howard; Angela Muriithi; Pedro Mendez-Tellez; Jonathan Sevransky; Carl Shanholtz; Giora Netzer; Peter J Pronovost; Dale M Needham Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Amartya Mukhopadhyay; Hwee S Yip; Dimple Prabhuswamy; Yiong H Chan; Jason Phua; Tow K Lim; Patricia Leong Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-01-27 Impact factor: 9.097