Literature DB >> 15090060

Lateral inhibition and habituation of the human auditory cortex.

C Pantev1, H Okamoto, B Ross, W Stoll, E Ciurlia-Guy, R Kakigi, T Kubo.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to compare the lateral inhibition and the habituation in the human auditory cortex, two important physiological effects during auditory processing that can be reliably measured by means of magnetoencephalography when recording auditory evoked fields. Applying 40-Hz amplitude-modulated stimuli allowed us to record simultaneously the slow transient evoked and the steady-state fields and thus to characterize the lateral inhibition and the habituation effect in primary and non-primary auditory cortical structures. The main finding of the study is that the lateral inhibition effect of non-primary auditory areas as measured on the major component of the slow transient auditory evoked field (N1) is significantly stronger than the corresponding habituation effect. By contrast, this effect was not observed for the 40-Hz steady-state fields, characterizing the activation of the primary auditory cortex in humans. The results might be interpreted as (i) evidence that the inhibition mediated by lateral connections is stronger than the habituation of excitatory neurons in the non-primary auditory cortex and (ii) the processing hierarchy in the human auditory cortex is demonstrated by the different behaviour of lateral inhibition and habituation in primary and non-primary auditory cortical structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15090060     DOI: 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03296.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  33 in total

1.  BOLD responses in human auditory cortex are more closely related to transient MEG responses than to sustained ones.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Matti S Hämäläinen; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Short-term plasticity as a neural mechanism supporting memory and attentional functions.

Authors:  Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jyrki Ahveninen; Mark L Andermann; John W Belliveau; Tommi Raij; Mikko Sams
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  The auditory enhancement effect is not reflected in the 80-Hz auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Samuele Carcagno; Christopher J Plack; Arthur Portron; Catherine Semal; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-21

4.  Preliminary evidence for reduced auditory lateral suppression in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Erin M Ramage; David M Weintraub; Sally J Vogel; Griffin P Sutton; Erik N Ringdahl; Daniel N Allen; Joel S Snyder
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Bottom-up driven involuntary attention modulates auditory signal in noise processing.

Authors:  Lothar Lagemann; Hidehiko Okamoto; Henning Teismann; Christo Pantev
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 6.  Experimental-neuromodeling framework for understanding auditory object processing: integrating data across multiple scales.

Authors:  Fatima T Husain; Barry Horwitz
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2006-10-31

7.  Listening to tailor-made notched music reduces tinnitus loudness and tinnitus-related auditory cortex activity.

Authors:  Hidehiko Okamoto; Henning Stracke; Wolfgang Stoll; Christo Pantev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Synaptic interactions and inhibitory regulation in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Caitlin E Askew; Raju Metherate
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  Asymmetric cortical adaptation effects during alternating auditory stimulation.

Authors:  Alfredo Brancucci; Giulia Prete; Elisa Meraglia; Alberto di Domenico; Victor Lugli; Barbara Penolazzi; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Two-stage processing of sounds explains behavioral performance variations due to changes in stimulus contrast and selective attention: an MEG study.

Authors:  Jaakko Kauramäki; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Jarno L Hänninen; Toni Auranen; Aapo Nummenmaa; Jouko Lampinen; Mikko Sams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.