J Hassler-Hurst1, C Wadham, G Rayman. 1. Diabetes Centre, Children and Young Adults Team, The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Heath Road, Ipswich, Suffolk IP4 5PD. UK.
Abstract
AIMS: To determine whether there is any difference between 0.5% and 1% tropicamide in ocular discomfort and mydriatic efficacy in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In a double-blind study, one drop of 0.5% tropicamide was instilled in one eye and one drop of 1% instilled in the other eye of 30 subjects aged 12-18 years. Drop strengths were randomized. Pupil size was measured before instillation, at 10, 20 and 30 min. Discomfort was measured using a recognized pain scale. RESULTS: Irrespective of the concentration of tropicamide used, all pupils dilated to at least 6 mm at 30 min, sufficient for successful ophthalmoscopy. Pain was significantly less when the lower concentration of tropicamide was used; pain score for the 0.5% group [median (interquartile range)] 1.0 (0-2) and 2.0 (1-3) for the 1.0% group, P = 0.009 (Wilcoxon rank test). CONCLUSIONS: This minor change in practice significantly reduces the distress associated with drop instillation without compromising the clinical examination, and may thus be important in encouraging compliance at the yearly diabetic review.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To determine whether there is any difference between 0.5% and 1% tropicamide in ocular discomfort and mydriatic efficacy in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In a double-blind study, one drop of 0.5% tropicamide was instilled in one eye and one drop of 1% instilled in the other eye of 30 subjects aged 12-18 years. Drop strengths were randomized. Pupil size was measured before instillation, at 10, 20 and 30 min. Discomfort was measured using a recognized pain scale. RESULTS: Irrespective of the concentration of tropicamide used, all pupils dilated to at least 6 mm at 30 min, sufficient for successful ophthalmoscopy. Pain was significantly less when the lower concentration of tropicamide was used; pain score for the 0.5% group [median (interquartile range)] 1.0 (0-2) and 2.0 (1-3) for the 1.0% group, P = 0.009 (Wilcoxon rank test). CONCLUSIONS: This minor change in practice significantly reduces the distress associated with drop instillation without compromising the clinical examination, and may thus be important in encouraging compliance at the yearly diabetic review.
Authors: Dan Ni Wang; Kyla Lavery; Stacey Dalgleish; Alexandra Howlett; Vivian E Hill; Stephanie A Dotchin Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Jackie M Street; Annette J Braunack-Mayer; Karen Facey; Richard E Ashcroft; Janet E Hiller Journal: Health Expect Date: 2008-04-22 Impact factor: 3.377