Literature DB >> 15087314

A comparative study of feature selection and multiclass classification methods for tissue classification based on gene expression.

Tao Li1, Chengliang Zhang, Mitsunori Ogihara.   

Abstract

This paper studies the problem of building multiclass classifiers for tissue classification based on gene expression. The recent development of microarray technologies has enabled biologists to quantify gene expression of tens of thousands of genes in a single experiment. Biologists have begun collecting gene expression for a large number of samples. One of the urgent issues in the use of microarray data is to develop methods for characterizing samples based on their gene expression. The most basic step in the research direction is binary sample classification, which has been studied extensively over the past few years. This paper investigates the next step-multiclass classification of samples based on gene expression. The characteristics of expression data (e.g. large number of genes with small sample size) makes the classification problem more challenging. The process of building multiclass classifiers is divided into two components: (i) selection of the features (i.e. genes) to be used for training and testing and (ii) selection of the classification method. This paper compares various feature selection methods as well as various state-of-the-art classification methods on various multiclass gene expression datasets. Our study indicates that multiclass classification problem is much more difficult than the binary one for the gene expression datasets. The difficulty lies in the fact that the data are of high dimensionality and that the sample size is small. The classification accuracy appears to degrade very rapidly as the number of classes increases. In particular, the accuracy was very low regardless of the choices of the methods for large-class datasets (e.g. NCI60 and GCM). While increasing the number of samples is a plausible solution to the problem of accuracy degradation, it is important to develop algorithms that are able to analyze effectively multiple-class expression data for these special datasets.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15087314     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  94 in total

1.  Network-based Prediction of Cancer under Genetic Storm.

Authors:  Ahmet Ay; Dihong Gong; Tamer Kahveci
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2014-10-15

2.  A hybrid BPSO-CGA approach for gene selection and classification of microarray data.

Authors:  Li-Yeh Chuang; Cheng-Huei Yang; Jung-Chike Li; Cheng-Hong Yang
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Identification of Marker Genes for Cancer Based on Microarrays Using a Computational Biology Approach.

Authors:  Xiaosheng Wang
Journal:  Curr Bioinform       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.543

4.  Improved breast cancer prognosis through the combination of clinical and genetic markers.

Authors:  Yijun Sun; Steve Goodison; Jian Li; Li Liu; William Farmerie
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-11-26       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Gene selection for multiclass prediction by weighted Fisher criterion.

Authors:  Jianhua Xuan; Yue Wang; Yibin Dong; Yuanjian Feng; Bin Wang; Javed Khan; Maria Bakay; Zuyi Wang; Lauren Pachman; Sara Winokur; Yi-Wen Chen; Robert Clarke; Eric Hoffman
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2007

6.  Investigating the efficacy of nonlinear dimensionality reduction schemes in classifying gene and protein expression studies.

Authors:  George Lee; Carlos Rodriguez; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  A classification framework applied to cancer gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Hussein Hijazi; Christina Chan
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.682

8.  Simple decision rules for classifying human cancers from gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Aik Choon Tan; Daniel Q Naiman; Lei Xu; Raimond L Winslow; Donald Geman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Performance of feature selection methods.

Authors:  Edward R Dougherty; Jianping Hua; Chao Sima
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.236

10.  Classification and feature selection algorithms for multi-class CGH data.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Sanjay Ranka; Tamer Kahveci
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.