Literature DB >> 15085930

Aneuploidy, the primary cause of the multilateral genomic instability of neoplastic and preneoplastic cells.

Peter Duesberg1, Alice Fabarius, Ruediger Hehlmann.   

Abstract

Cancers have a clonal origin, yet their chromosomes and genes are non-clonal or heterogeneous due to an inherent genomic instability. However, the cause of this genomic instability is still debated. One theory postulates that mutations in genes that are involved in DNA repair and in chromosome segregation are the primary causes of this instability. But there are neither consistent correlations nor is there functional proof for the mutation theory. Here we propose aneuploidy, an abnormal number of chromosomes, as the primary cause of the genomic instability of neoplastic and preneoplastic cells. Aneuploidy destabilizes the karyotype and thus the species, independent of mutation, because it corrupts highly conserved teams of proteins that segregate, synthesize and repair chromosomes. Likewise it destabilizes genes. The theory explains 12 of 12 specific features of genomic instability: (1) Mutagenic and non-mutagenic carcinogens induce genomic instability via aneuploidy. (2) Aneuploidy coincides and segregates with preneoplastic and neoplastic genomic instability. (3) Phenotypes of genomically unstable cells change and even revert at high rates, compared to those of diploid cells, via aneuploidy-catalyzed chromosome rearrangements. (4) Idiosyncratic features of cancers, like immortality and drug-resistance, derive from subspecies within the 'polyphyletic' diversity of individual cancers. (5) Instability is proportional to the degree of aneuploidy. (6) Multilateral chromosomal and genetic instabilities typically coincide, because aneuploidy corrupts multiple targets simultaneously. (7) Gene mutation is common, but neither consistent nor clonal in cancer cells as predicted by the aneuploidy theory. (8) Cancers fall into a near-diploid (2 N) class of low instability, a near 1.5 N class of high instability, or a near 3 N class of very high instability, because aneuploid fitness is maximized either by minimally unstable karyotypes or by maximally unstable, but adaptable karyotypes. (9) Dominant phenotypes, because of aneuploid genotypes. (10) Uncertain developmental phenotypes of Down and other aneuploidy syndromes, because supply-sensitive, diploid programs are destabilized by products from aneuploid genes supplied at abnormal concentrations; the maternal age-bias for Down's would reflect age-dependent defects of the spindle apparatus of oocytes. (11) Non-selective phenotypes, e.g., metastasis, because of linkage with selective phenotypes on the same chromosomes. (12) The target, induction of genomic instability, is several 1000-fold bigger than gene mutation, because it is entire chromosomes. The mutation theory explains only a few of these features. We conclude that the transition of stable diploid to unstable aneuploid cell species is the primary cause of preneoplastic and neoplastic genomic instability and of cancer, and that mutations are secondary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15085930     DOI: 10.1080/15216540410001667902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IUBMB Life        ISSN: 1521-6543            Impact factor:   3.885


  28 in total

1.  From aneuploidy to cancer: the evolution of a new species?

Authors:  Samuel Knauss; Andreas Klein
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Polyploidy-induction by dihydroxylated monochlorobiphenyls: structure-activity-relationships.

Authors:  Susanne Flor; Gabriele Ludewig
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 3.  A poor imitation of a natural process: a call to reconsider the iPSC engineering technique.

Authors:  Yemin Zhang; Lin Yao; Xiya Yu; Jun Ou; Ning Hui; Shanrong Liu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Hematopoietic Stem Cells from Ts65Dn Mice Are Deficient in the Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  Yingying Wang; Jianhui Chang; Lijian Shao; Wei Feng; Yi Luo; Marie Chow; Wei Du; Aimin Meng; Daohong Zhou
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Monosomy of chromosome 8 could be considered as a primary preneoplastic event in breast cancer: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Fabiola A García Parra-Pérez; Angel Zavala-Pompa; Javier Pacheco-Calleros; Elva I Cortés-Gutiérrez; Ricardo M Cerda-Flores; Sandra Lara-Miranda; Martha I Dávila-Rodríguez
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Full Karyotype Interphase Cell Analysis.

Authors:  Adi Baumgartner; Christy Ferlatte Hartshorne; Aris A Polyzos; Heinz-Ulrich G Weier; Jingly Fung Weier; Ben O'Brien
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  DNA study of bladder papillary tumours chemically induced by N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl) nitrosamine in Fisher rats.

Authors:  Paula A Oliveira; Filomena Adega; Carlos A Palmeira; Raquel M Chaves; Aura A Colaço; Henrique Guedes-Pinto; Luis F De la Cruz P; Carlos A Lopes
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  The Polycomb group protein EZH2 impairs DNA repair in breast epithelial cells.

Authors:  Michael Zeidler; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Qi Cao; Arul M Chinnaiyan; David O Ferguson; Sofia D Merajver; Celina G Kleer
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 9.  Aneuploidy as an early mechanistic event in metal carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Sandra S Wise; John Pierce Wise
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.407

Review 10.  Revisiting tumour aneuploidy - the place of ploidy assessment in the molecular era.

Authors:  Håvard E Danielsen; Manohar Pradhan; Marco Novelli
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.