BACKGROUND: The main objective of this study was to investigate the construct validity of the WHOQOL-BREF by use of Rasch and Item Response Theory models and to examine the stability of the model across high/low scoring individuals, gender, education, and depressive illness. Furthermore, the objective of the study was to estimate the reference data for the quality of life questionnaire WHOQOL-BREF in the general Danish population and in subgroups defined by age, gender, and education. METHODS: Mail-out-mail-back questionnaires were sent to a randomly selected sample of the Danish general population. The response rate was 68.5%, and the sample reported here contained 1101 respondents: 578 women and 519 men (four respondents did not indicate their genders). RESULTS: Each of the four domains of the WHOQOL-BREF scale fitted a two-parameter IRT model, but did not fit the Rasch model. Due to multidimensionality, the total score of 26 items fitted neither model. Regression analysis was carried out, showing a level of explained variance of between 10 and 14%. The mean scores of the WHOQOL-BREF are reported as normative data for the general Danish population. CONCLUSION: The profile of the four WHOQOL-BREF domains is a more adequate expression of quality of life than the total score of all 26 items. Although none of the subscales are statistically sufficient measures of their domains, the profile scores seem to be adequate approximations to the optimal score.
BACKGROUND: The main objective of this study was to investigate the construct validity of the WHOQOL-BREF by use of Rasch and Item Response Theory models and to examine the stability of the model across high/low scoring individuals, gender, education, and depressive illness. Furthermore, the objective of the study was to estimate the reference data for the quality of life questionnaire WHOQOL-BREF in the general Danish population and in subgroups defined by age, gender, and education. METHODS: Mail-out-mail-back questionnaires were sent to a randomly selected sample of the Danish general population. The response rate was 68.5%, and the sample reported here contained 1101 respondents: 578 women and 519 men (four respondents did not indicate their genders). RESULTS: Each of the four domains of the WHOQOL-BREF scale fitted a two-parameter IRT model, but did not fit the Rasch model. Due to multidimensionality, the total score of 26 items fitted neither model. Regression analysis was carried out, showing a level of explained variance of between 10 and 14%. The mean scores of the WHOQOL-BREF are reported as normative data for the general Danish population. CONCLUSION: The profile of the four WHOQOL-BREF domains is a more adequate expression of quality of life than the total score of all 26 items. Although none of the subscales are statistically sufficient measures of their domains, the profile scores seem to be adequate approximations to the optimal score.
Authors: M Groenvold; P M Fayers; M A Sprangers; J B Bjorner; M C Klee; N K Aaronson; P Bech; H T Mouridsen Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Luciane N Cruz; Carisi A Polanczyk; Suzi A Camey; Juliana F Hoffmann; Marcelo P Fleck Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-01-29 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Christian U Krägeloh; Paula Kersten; D Rex Billington; Patricia Hsien-Chuan Hsu; Daniel Shepherd; Jason Landon; Xuan Joanna Feng Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2012-09-15 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Robert P Schwartz; Sharon M Kelly; Shannon G Mitchell; Laura Dunlap; Gary A Zarkin; Anjalee Sharma; Kevin E O'Grady; Jerome H Jaffe Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Kamilla W Miskowiak; Maj Vinberg; Ellen M Christensen; Jens D Bukh; Catherine J Harmer; Hannelore Ehrenreich; Lars V Kessing Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 7.853