Literature DB >> 15085130

Variable female preferences drive complex male displays.

Seth W Coleman1, Gail L Patricelli, Gerald Borgia.   

Abstract

Complexity in male sexual displays is widely appreciated but diversity in female mate choice has received little attention. Males of many species have sexual displays composed of multiple display traits, and females are thought to use these different traits in mate choice. Models of multiple display trait evolution suggest that these traits provide females with different kinds of information in different stages of the mate choice process, or function as redundant signals to improve the accuracy of mate assessment. We suggest that complex male displays might also arise because of variation in female preferences for particular male display traits. The causes of female preference variation have received little attention, and the role of preference variation in shaping complex male displays is unclear. Here we show that in satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus) female mate choice is a multistage process, where females of different ages use different male display traits in successive stages. Age- and stage-specific female preferences may contribute to explaining the widespread occurrence of multifaceted male displays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15085130     DOI: 10.1038/nature02419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  28 in total

Review 1.  Looking for sexual selection in the female brain.

Authors:  Molly E Cummings
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Female preference for multi-modal courtship: multiple signals are important for male mating success in peacock spiders.

Authors:  Madeline B Girard; Damian O Elias; Michael M Kasumovic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Socially transmitted mate preferences in a monogamous bird: a non-genetic mechanism of sexual selection.

Authors:  John P Swaddle; Mark G Cathey; Maureen Correll; Brendan P Hodkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Larger swordtail females prefer asymmetrical males.

Authors:  Molly R Morris; Oscar Rios-Cardenas; M Scarlett Tudor
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Decoration supplementation and male-male competition in the great bowerbird (Ptilonorhynchus nuchalis): a test of the social control hypothesis.

Authors:  Natalie R Doerr
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Does segregating variation in sexual or microhabitat preferences lead to non-random mating within a population of Drosophila melanogaster?

Authors:  Brad R Foley; Anne Genissel; Harmon L Kristy; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Mate choice in the eye and ear of the beholder? Female multimodal sensory configuration influences her preferences.

Authors:  Kelly L Ronald; Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The multiple signals assessed by female satin bowerbirds: could they be used to narrow down females' choices of mates?

Authors:  Timothy E Robson; Anne W Goldizen; David J Green
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Mating first, mating more: biological market fluctuation in a wild prosimian.

Authors:  Ivan Norscia; Daniela Antonacci; Elisabetta Palagi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Localizing brain regions associated with female mate preference behavior in a swordtail.

Authors:  Ryan Y Wong; Mary E Ramsey; Molly E Cummings
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.