OBJECTIVES: To validate the use of cDNA based microarray on synovial biopsies by analysing the experimental variability due to amplification of RNA, reproducibility of the assay, heterogeneity of the tissue, and statistical analysis. METHODS: Total RNA was extracted from three spondyloarthropathy (SpA) and three osteoarthritis (OA) synovial tissue biopsy specimens and from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of four healthy donors. Exponential RNA amplification by SMART-PCR was compared with linear amplification. Reproducibility was tested by comparing different microarray systems and by performing duplicate experiments. Sample heterogeneity was assessed by comparing overall gene expression profiles, histopathology, and analysis of genes expressed in the synovium and normal PBMC. Statistical analysis using t test and Bonferroni adjustment was verified by permutation of class labels. RESULTS: Gene expression was concordant in 12/14 (86%) cytokine/chemokine genes between both microarrays and different RNA amplification systems. When one microarray system was used, expressed genes were 78-95% concordant in duplicate experiments. Gene expression profiles had a higher degree of similarity between SpA synovium than between PBMC or OA synovium despite clear histopathological differences between synovial samples. Comparison of SpA synovium with OA synovium and with PBMC yielded 11 and 18 expressed transcripts, respectively; six were shared in both comparisons. Permutations of SpA and OA samples yielded only one expressed gene in 19 comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide evidence that microarrays can be used for analysis of synovial tissue biopsies with high reproducibility and low variability of the generated gene expression profiles.
OBJECTIVES: To validate the use of cDNA based microarray on synovial biopsies by analysing the experimental variability due to amplification of RNA, reproducibility of the assay, heterogeneity of the tissue, and statistical analysis. METHODS: Total RNA was extracted from three spondyloarthropathy (SpA) and three osteoarthritis (OA) synovial tissue biopsy specimens and from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of four healthy donors. Exponential RNA amplification by SMART-PCR was compared with linear amplification. Reproducibility was tested by comparing different microarray systems and by performing duplicate experiments. Sample heterogeneity was assessed by comparing overall gene expression profiles, histopathology, and analysis of genes expressed in the synovium and normal PBMC. Statistical analysis using t test and Bonferroni adjustment was verified by permutation of class labels. RESULTS: Gene expression was concordant in 12/14 (86%) cytokine/chemokine genes between both microarrays and different RNA amplification systems. When one microarray system was used, expressed genes were 78-95% concordant in duplicate experiments. Gene expression profiles had a higher degree of similarity between SpA synovium than between PBMC or OA synovium despite clear histopathological differences between synovial samples. Comparison of SpA synovium with OA synovium and with PBMC yielded 11 and 18 expressed transcripts, respectively; six were shared in both comparisons. Permutations of SpA and OA samples yielded only one expressed gene in 19 comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide evidence that microarrays can be used for analysis of synovial tissue biopsies with high reproducibility and low variability of the generated gene expression profiles.
Authors: A A Alizadeh; M B Eisen; R E Davis; C Ma; I S Lossos; A Rosenwald; J C Boldrick; H Sabet; T Tran; X Yu; J I Powell; L Yang; G E Marti; T Moore; J Hudson; L Lu; D B Lewis; R Tibshirani; G Sherlock; W C Chan; T C Greiner; D D Weisenburger; J O Armitage; R Warnke; R Levy; W Wilson; M R Grever; J C Byrd; D Botstein; P O Brown; L M Staudt Journal: Nature Date: 2000-02-03 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: D Baeten; P Demetter; C Cuvelier; F Van Den Bosch; E Kruithof; N Van Damme; G Verbruggen; H Mielants; E M Veys; F De Keyser Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: M D Smith; D Baeten; A-K Ulfgren; I B McInnes; O Fitzgerald; B Bresnihan; P P Tak; D Veale Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2005-06-23 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: George Du; Liyou Qiu; Ling Shen; Probhat Sehgal; Yun Shen; Dan Huang; Norman L Letvin; Zheng W Chen Journal: J Immunol Methods Date: 2005-11-15 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Markus Rihl; Christian Barthel; Andreas Klos; Reinhold E Schmidt; Paul P Tak; Henning Zeidler; Jens G Kuipers Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: M Rihl; E Kruithof; C Barthel; F De Keyser; E M Veys; H Zeidler; D T Y Yu; J G Kuipers; D Baeten Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2005-04-07 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Christian Barthel; Nataliya Yeremenko; Roland Jacobs; Reinhold E Schmidt; Michael Bernateck; Henning Zeidler; Paul-Peter Tak; Dominique Baeten; Markus Rihl Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2009-06-02 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: N J W de Wit; J Rijntjes; J H S Diepstra; T H van Kuppevelt; U H Weidle; D J Ruiter; G N P van Muijen Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2005-06-20 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Gethin P Thomas; Ran Duan; Allison R Pettit; Helen Weedon; Simranpreet Kaur; Malcolm Smith; Matthew A Brown Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2013-12-15 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Sina Schrader; Andreas Klos; Simone Hess; Henning Zeidler; Jens G Kuipers; Markus Rihl Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2007 Impact factor: 5.156