Literature DB >> 11747617

Identifying differentially expressed genes in cDNA microarray experiments.

K A Baggerly1, K R Coombes, K R Hess, D N Stivers, L V Abruzzo, W Zhang.   

Abstract

A major goal of microarray experiments is to determine which genes are differentially expressed between samples. Differential expression has been assessed by taking ratios of expression levels of different samples at a spot on the array and flagging spots (genes) where the magnitude of the fold difference exceeds some threshold. More recent work has attempted to incorporate the fact that the variability of these ratios is not constant. Most methods are variants of Student's t-test. These variants standardize the ratios by dividing by an estimate of the standard deviation of that ratio; spots with large standardized values are flagged. Estimating these standard deviations requires replication of the measurements, either within a slide or between slides, or the use of a model describing what the standard deviation should be. Starting from considerations of the kinetics driving microarray hybridization, we derive models for the intensity of a replicated spot, when replication is performed within and between arrays. Replication within slides leads to a beta-binomial model, and replication between slides leads to a gamma-Poisson model. These models predict how the variance of a log ratio changes with the total intensity of the signal at the spot, independent of the identity of the gene. Ratios for genes with a small amount of total signal are highly variable, whereas ratios for genes with a large amount of total signal are fairly stable. Log ratios are scaled by the standard deviations given by these functions, giving model-based versions of Studentization. An example is given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11747617     DOI: 10.1089/106652701753307539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  19 in total

1.  A classification-based machine learning approach for the analysis of genome-wide expression data.

Authors:  James Lyons-Weiler; Satish Patel; Soumyaroop Bhattacharya
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Data extraction from composite oligonucleotide microarrays.

Authors:  Ilya Shmulevich; Jaakko Astola; David Cogdell; Stanley R Hamilton; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  A mixture model approach to detecting differentially expressed genes with microarray data.

Authors:  Wei Pan; Jizhen Lin; Chap T Le
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 3.410

4.  Technical validation of cDNA based microarray as screening technique to identify candidate genes in synovial tissue biopsy specimens from patients with spondyloarthropathy.

Authors:  M Rihl; D Baeten; N Seta; J Gu; F De Keyser; E M Veys; J G Kuipers; H Zeidler; D T Y Yu
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Biological validation of differentially expressed genes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia identified by applying multiple statistical methods to oligonucleotide microarrays.

Authors:  Lynne V Abruzzo; Jing Wang; Mini Kapoor; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Michael J Keating; W Edward Highsmith; Lynn L Barron; Candy C Cromwell; Kevin R Coombes
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.568

6.  Phosphorylation of Thr18 and Ser20 of p53 in Ad-p53-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  Akira Nakamizo; Toshiyuko Amano; Wei Zhang; Xin-Qiao Zhang; Latha Ramdas; Ta-Jen Liu; B Nebiyou Bekele; Tadahisa Shono; Tomio Sasaki; William F Benedict; Raymond Sawaya; Frederick F Lang
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Combination of 5-fluorouracil and N1,N11-diethylnorspermine markedly activates spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase expression, depletes polyamines, and synergistically induces apoptosis in colon carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Woonyoung Choi; Eugene W Gerner; Latha Ramdas; Jheri Dupart; Jennifer Carew; Lynsey Proctor; Peng Huang; Wei Zhang; Stanley R Hamilton
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Within the fold: assessing differential expression measures and reproducibility in microarray assays.

Authors:  Ivana V Yang; Emily Chen; Jeremy P Hasseman; Wei Liang; Bryan C Frank; Shuibang Wang; Vasily Sharov; Alexander I Saeed; Joseph White; Jerry Li; Norman H Lee; Timothy J Yeatman; John Quackenbush
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Nearest Neighbor Networks: clustering expression data based on gene neighborhoods.

Authors:  Curtis Huttenhower; Avi I Flamholz; Jessica N Landis; Sauhard Sahi; Chad L Myers; Kellen L Olszewski; Matthew A Hibbs; Nathan O Siemers; Olga G Troyanskaya; Hilary A Coller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The limit fold change model: a practical approach for selecting differentially expressed genes from microarray data.

Authors:  David M Mutch; Alvin Berger; Robert Mansourian; Andreas Rytz; Matthew-Alan Roberts
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-06-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.