Literature DB >> 15081209

Midwifery practice and the crisis of modernity: implications for the role of the midwife.

Abbey Hyde1, Bernadette Roche-Reid.   

Abstract

Almost since its inception, the concept of modernity was found to display tensions between its emancipatory potential to liberate the human subject from the manacles of tradition, and the application of reason to co-ordinate and control the natural world through scientific knowledge. This paper presents a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with 12 midwives about their role in the Irish maternity services and argues that, in a period of late modernity, these tensions continue to manifest themselves in the context of the midwife's role. Although the contemporary period is marked by a loss of faith in scientific truths, widely contested obstetric knowledge and practices continue to exercise mastery over nature while undermining a central feature of the midwife's role-the liberation of the autonomous subject. Drawing on the theory of communicative action developed by the critical theorist Jürgen Habermas, it is argued that the midwife's role in facilitating the autonomous choices of women through communicative action is impeded by the colonization of the lifeworld of labour and childbirth by the technocratic system of obstetrics. Although participants reported that their role involved empowering women and facilitating choices through dialogue congruent with communicative action, data also suggested that participants used strategic communication with clients aimed at achieving particular ends. The use of strategic communication was linked to the way in which the midwife's role is determined to a large extent by the practices and protocols of obstetrics, and also to the notion of client passivity. The instrumental rationality of obstetrics is linked to an outcome orientation to power and money, and a political economy perspective of medicine. It appears that communicative action between midwives and obstetricians is important in bringing about structural changes to facilitate the conditions for communicative action between midwives and their clients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15081209     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  7 in total

1.  The rhetoric of informed choice: perspectives from midwives on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring.

Authors:  Carol Hindley; Ann M Thomson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  A questioned authority meets well-informed pregnant women--a qualitative study examining how midwives perceive their role in dietary counselling.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Wennberg; Åsa Hörnsten; Katarina Hamberg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Midwives' perceptions of being 'with woman': a phenomenological study.

Authors:  Zoe Bradfield; Yvonne Hauck; Ravani Duggan; Michelle Kelly
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Client-care provider interaction during labour and birth as experienced by women: Respect, communication, confidentiality and autonomy.

Authors:  Marit S G van der Pijl; Marlies Kasperink; Martine H Hollander; Corine Verhoeven; Elselijn Kingma; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Professional competition amidst intractable maternal mortality: Midwifery in rural Pakistan during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Shayzal Siddiqui; Carolyn Smith-Morris
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Perceptions of labour pain management of Dutch primary care midwives: a focus group study.

Authors:  Trudy Klomp; Ank de Jonge; Eileen K Hutton; Suzanne Hers; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Project 20: Midwives' insight into continuity of care models for women with social risk factors: what works, for whom, in what circumstances, and how.

Authors:  Hannah Rayment-Jones; Sergio A Silverio; James Harris; Angela Harden; Jane Sandall
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.372

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.