Literature DB >> 28348732

Probuphine® (buprenorphine implant): a promising candidate in opioid dependence.

Preeti Barnwal1, Saibal Das2, Somnath Mondal3, Anand Ramasamy4, Tanay Maiti5, Arunava Saha6.   

Abstract

Opioid dependence leads to physical dependence and addiction which finally results in profound medical, psychological and social dysfunction. One of the useful medications for opioid dependence is buprenorphine, the partial opioid agonist, which is used alone or in combination with naloxone. However, buprenorphine is the victim of its own success due to its illicit use and accidental poisoning in children. Also, buprenorphine typically requires daily self-administration and its effectiveness heavily depends on patient adherence. So, poor treatment adherence results in ineffective treatment manifesting as craving and withdrawal symptoms. Short-term use of buprenorphine in opioid dependence is also often followed by relapse. Buprenorphine when used sublingually often results in inadequate or fluctuating blood concentrations and poorer treatment retention compared with methadone. All of these led to the development of Probuphine®, a polymeric matrix composed of ethylene vinyl acetate and buprenorphine in the form of implants, that are implanted subdermally in office practice and deliver the active drug over 6 months. Buprenorphine release from such implant is fairly consistent, avoiding plasma peaks and troughs, and the implant is also reported to be safe. In this review article, we have highlighted these aspects of treatment of opioid addiction, stressing on the pharmacology of buprenorphine and Probuphine®, and relevant clinical trials addressing the efficacy and safety of Probuphine®. This sustained-release implantable formulation of buprenorphine has the potential to be a suitable alternative to daily or alternate day sublingual buprenorphine which can thereby eliminate the need for daily supervision, minimizing fluctuations in plasma concentrations, and allowing these patients to reduce clinic or pharmacy visits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Probuphine®; addiction; buprenorphine; implant; opioid dependence

Year:  2016        PMID: 28348732      PMCID: PMC5354129          DOI: 10.1177/2045125316681984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 2045-1253


  80 in total

Review 1.  Addiction and the brain antireward system.

Authors:  George F Koob; Michel Le Moal
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Diversion and abuse of buprenorphine: findings from national surveys of treatment patients and physicians.

Authors:  Chris-Ellyn Johanson; Cynthia L Arfken; Salvatore di Menza; Charles Roberts Schuster
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Acute administration of buprenorphine in humans: partial agonist and blockade effects.

Authors:  S L Walsh; K L Preston; G E Bigelow; M L Stitzer
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Lack of reduction in buprenorphine injection after introduction of co-formulated buprenorphine/naloxone to the Malaysian market.

Authors:  R Douglas Bruce; Sumathi Govindasamy; Laurie Sylla; Adeeba Kamarulzaman; Frederick L Altice
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.829

5.  Open-label dose-finding trial of buprenorphine implants (Probuphine) for treatment of heroin dependence.

Authors:  Jason White; James Bell; John B Saunders; Paul Williamson; Maria Makowska; Aaron Farquharson; Katherine L Beebe
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 6.  Buprenorphine in the treatment of opioid dependence.

Authors:  Eugen Davids; Markus Gastpar
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.600

7.  A long-acting buprenorphine delivery system.

Authors:  R B Pontani; A L Misra
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.533

8.  Disposition in the rat of buprenorphine administered parenterally and as a subcutaneous implant.

Authors:  R B Pontani; N L Vadlamani; A L Misra
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 1.908

9.  Buprenorphine versus methadone maintenance: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Christopher M Doran; Marian Shanahan; Richard P Mattick; Robert Ali; Jason White; James Bell
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Buprenorphine maintenance treatment in a primary care setting: outcomes at 1 year.

Authors:  Janet M Soeffing; L David Martin; Michael I Fingerhood; Donald R Jasinski; Darius A Rastegar
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2009-06-23
View more
  6 in total

1.  Perceptions and preferences for long-acting injectable and implantable medications in comparison to short-acting medications for opioid use disorders.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Saunders; Sarah K Moore; Olivia Walsh; Stephen A Metcalf; Alan J Budney; Emily Scherer; Lisa A Marsch
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2020-01-21

Review 2.  [New slow-release buprenorphine formulations for optimization of opioid substitution].

Authors:  Michael Soyka; Oliver Pogarell
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Predictors of availability of long-acting medication for opioid use disorder.

Authors:  Chelsea L Shover; Keith Humphreys
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Buprenorphine and its formulations: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Salomon Poliwoda; Nazir Noor; Jack S Jenkins; Cain W Stark; Mattie Steib; Jamal Hasoon; Giustino Varrassi; Ivan Urits; Omar Viswanath; Adam M Kaye; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Health Psychol Res       Date:  2022-08-20

5.  Patient-Reported Outcomes, Experiences and Satisfaction with Weekly and Monthly Injectable Prolonged-Release Buprenorphine.

Authors:  Graham Parsons; Cindy Ragbir; Oscar D'Agnone; Ayana Gibbs; Richard Littlewood; Bernadette Hard
Journal:  Subst Abuse Rehabil       Date:  2020-11-02

Review 6.  Implantable Drug Delivery Systems and Foreign Body Reaction: Traversing the Current Clinical Landscape.

Authors:  Alexey Fayzullin; Alesia Bakulina; Karen Mikaelyan; Anatoly Shekhter; Anna Guller
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.