Literature DB >> 15080558

Anti-nucleosome, anti-chromatin, anti-dsDNA and anti-histone antibody reactivity in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Concepción González1, Belen Garcia-Berrocal, Oscar Herráez, José Alejandro Navajo, José Manuel González-Buitrago.   

Abstract

Anti-nucleosome (anti-chromatin) antibodies play a key role in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The objective of the present study was to determine the clinical significance of anti-nucleosome (anti-chromatin) antibodies, anti-dsDNA antibodies and anti-histone antibodies in patients with SLE in relation to patients with positive nuclear antibodies and healthy controls. We measured anti-nucleosome (anti-chromatin) antibodies, anti-dsDNA antibodies and anti-histone antibodies in 70 patients with SLE, 35 antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive subjects without autoimmune disease and 35 blood donors. All antibodies were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We obtained the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) for each autoantibody. Likewise, we obtained the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios for each autoantibody. The highest AUC was obtained for anti-nucleosome (0.898) and the lowest AUC for a kit for anti-dsDNA (0.725). Stratification of the control group (ANA-positive subjects without autoimmune disease and blood donors) produced significant changes in the AUCs; all AUCs decreased when ANA-positive patients without autoimmune disease were considered as controls and all AUCs increased when blood donors were considered as controls. These effects were less marked in anti-dsDNA antibodies. We observed discrepancies between kits (anti-nucleosome and anti-chromatin and two for anti-dsDNA). The highest sensitivity for SLE was obtained for anti-nucleosome antibodies (86%) and the highest specificity was obtained for anti-dsDNA antibodies (90%). In conclusion, anti-nucleosome and anti-chromatin kits show different degrees of clinical accuracy due to the cut-off selected by the manufacturer. Once the kits with the best performance and the optimal cut-offs have been selected, anti-nucleosome antibodies and anti-dsDNA antibodies provide similar information in established SLE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15080558     DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2004.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  The clinical utility of anti-chromatin antibodies as measured by BioPlex 2200 in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus versus other rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Nilanjana Bose; Xiaofeng Wang; Majula Gupta; Qingping Yao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2012-08-22

2.  Anti-chromatin and anti-histone antibodies in Egyptian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Adel A Shabana; Atef E El-Ghawet; Shereen A Machaly; Ekbal M Abu Hashim; Basma A El-Kady; Reham Shaat
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Anti-histones antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: prevalence and frequency in neuropsychiatric lupus.

Authors:  Xiao-Yun Sun; Jinxia Shi; Lei Han; Yin Su; Zhan-Guo Li
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Epitope-Specific Anti-C1q Autoantibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  Jessica S Kleer; Pascal A Rabatscher; Jessica Weiss; Joel Leonardi; Severin B Vogt; Andrea Kieninger-Gräfitsch; Carlo Chizzolini; Uyen Huynh-Do; Camillo Ribi; Marten Trendelenburg
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Lamotrigine-Induced Lupus With Aseptic Meningitis and Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis.

Authors:  Dena H Tran; Kory S Jaggon; Jamal Mikdashi; Robert D Chow; Avelino C Verceles; Aseem Sood
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-26

6.  Redefining the Scl-70 indirect immunofluorescence pattern: autoantibodies to DNA topoisomerase I yield a specific compound immunofluorescence pattern.

Authors:  Alessandra Dellavance; Cristiane Gallindo; Mariana Guanaes Soares; Neusa Pereira da Silva; Renato Arruda Mortara; Luís Eduardo Coelho Andrade
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 7.580

7.  Clinical Performance of Two Automated Immunoassays, EliA CTD Screen and QUANTA Flash CTD Screen Plus, for Antinuclear Antibody Screening.

Authors:  Sumi Yoon; Hee-Won Moon; Hanah Kim; Mina Hur; Yeo-Min Yun
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.464

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.